Performance & Direction: Cyborg 2087 Review
Last updated: January 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Cyborg 2087 (1966) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Science Fiction.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Cyborg 2087 features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Rennie . Supported by the likes of Karen Steele and Wendell Corey , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Cyborg 2087 (1966) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Cyborg 2087
Quick Plot Summary: Cyborg 2087 is a Science Fiction, Mystery film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Cyborg 2087
Ending Breakdown: Cyborg 2087 attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the science fiction themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Cyborg 2087 reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Cyborg 2087?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Science Fiction films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Cyborg 2087
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Cyborg 2087 Online?
Streaming HubCyborg 2087 Parents Guide & Age Rating
1966 AdvisoryWondering about Cyborg 2087 age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Cyborg 2087 is 86 minutes (1h 26m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, Cyborg 2087 stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1966 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cyborg 2087 worth watching?
Cyborg 2087 is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies. It has a verified rating of 5.8/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Cyborg 2087 parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Cyborg 2087 identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Cyborg 2087?
The total duration of Cyborg 2087 is 86 minutes, which is approximately 1h 26m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Cyborg 2087
How Cyborg 2087 Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Cyborg 2087
Once again, Michael Rennie dons a tin-foil suit to come and warn mankind to amend it's ways. This time, though, he is a cyborg called "Garth 7" sent back from the year 2087 to try and stop an evolutionary process that will rob us all of our ability to think for ourselves. He manages to ally with "Dr. Mason" (Karen Steele) but pretty soon they are aware that the government they wish to thwart has also sent agents back and so not just time, but other folks from the future are against them too. This is cheap and cheerful, pedestrianly written, afternoon fodder that is very light on science or characterisations. Rennie looks like he maybe only did the one filming day, such is the truncated nature of the editing - and the special effects (his bio-implants, especially) are not up to very much, either. Oddly enough, it might have looked better in black and white, somehow the colour just makes it look even more sloppily thrown together. Potentially, an interesting take on a well used idea, but sadly it offers little we haven't seen before and the star is well past his best.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
