Is Dahomey Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Dahomey is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 68 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Dahomey is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, Dahomey is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 68 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2024, Dahomey emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Thousands of royal artifacts of Dahomey, a West African kingdom, were taken by French colonists in the 19th century for collection and display in Paris. Unlike standard genre fare, Dahomey attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Dahomey features a noteworthy lineup led by Lucrèce Hougbelo . Supported by the likes of Parfait Vaiayinon and Didier Sedoha Nassangade , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Dahomey (2024) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Dahomey is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Dahomey concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Dahomey reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $506.1K |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
MUBI
MUBI Amazon Channel
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.6/10, and global collection metrics, Dahomey stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2024 cinematic year.
Dahomey has received mixed reviews with a 6.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Dahomey is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Documentary movies, but read reviews first.
Dahomey is currently available for streaming on MUBI. You can also check for it on platforms like MUBI, MUBI Amazon Channel depending on your region.
With over 7,000 pieces taken by the colonising French from their homes in the ancient African kingdom of Dahomey (now Benin), there is much celebration amongst the population at the return of 26 artefacts. These range from statues of their legendary Kings Ghezo and Béhanzin to objects of religious significance and items of such an intricate design that their condition will require perpetual care in a new, purpose-built, home near the Presidential Palace. Sadly, we just don't spend enough time with these beautifully crafted sculptures, nor do we really learn very much about the history of them, their historical provenance nor really anything much about the colonial "treaties" that facilitated their move in the first place. It lacks a narration. Not often that bothers me, but at times this whole thing reminded me of one of those films you'd watch for ten minutes if you were visiting a museum before you moved on. It's presented as if it were the introductory edition of a multi-part documentary that was going to explore more and fill in many of the gaps left unexplained in this hour long preview. Too much of it is spent following a group of young people in a forum arguing about the relative merits (or demerits) of this gesture from the French, and though it can be interesting at times to listen to the differing views in this "what's past is prologue" type debate, it wasn't what I wanted to see. I wanted much more about the fascinating mythology that attributed animal features to human beings in the way the Egyptians did two thousand years earlier. What was their significance? How were they to be conserved, preserved, exhibited - and, quite importantly, to whom. None of that was really gone into and I found that all a little disappointing. It may stimulate further reading but as it stands, it's not great.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.