Is Damage Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Damage is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 111 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Damage is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Damage is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 111 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1992, Damage emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The life of a respected British politician at the height of his career crumbles when he becomes obsessed with his son's lover. Unlike standard genre fare, Damage attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Damage features a noteworthy lineup led by Jeremy Irons . Supported by the likes of Juliette Binoche and Miranda Richardson , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Damage (1992) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Damage is a Drama, Romance film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
This character-driven narrative explores the internal and external conflicts that define the human experience. The life of a respected British politician at the height of his career crumbles when he becomes obsessed with his son's lover. The screenplay takes time to develop its characters, allowing audiences to connect emotionally with their struggles and triumphs. Each scene builds upon the last, creating a cumulative emotional impact.
Ending Breakdown: Damage concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Damage reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $11.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $31.0M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Damage is $11.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Fandango At Home
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.6/10, and global collection metrics, Damage stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1992 cinematic year.
Damage has received mixed reviews with a 6.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Damage is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Damage may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Harrowing movie, Juliette Binoche and Jeremy Irons have great chemistry. It’s a very ‘arty’ film . But it leaves you feeling queasy when you realize the consequences. Good show!
Jeremy Irons is a happily married (to Miranda Richardson) British government minister who meets his usually quite rakish son's (Rupert Graves) latest girlfriend (Juliette Binoche). The two click immediately - and soon they are doing a lot more than just clicking. That's about it - they carry out their clandestine liaison with all it's concomitant risks and thrills before an ending that I really thought underwhelming. This is one of the frequently wooden Irons' better efforts, Graves still has his "Scudder" hair from "Maurice" (1987) and Binoche works well as the femme fatale, but somehow the story just plods along. It looks good, but the pace is all just to procedural and aside from the pitiable, and under-used, Richardson, the remaining characters engender little that is likeable or personable. Even the (infrequent) sex scenes lack intimacy or intensity; it's all just a little bit A+B=C, for me.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.