Is Daredevil Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Daredevil is likely a skip if you enjoy Fantasy movies.
It features a runtime of 103 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Daredevil is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Fantasy, Action genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Daredevil is likely a skip if you enjoy Fantasy movies.
It features a runtime of 103 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2003, Daredevil emerges as a significant entry in the Fantasy, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A man blinded in a childhood accident fights crime using his superhumanly-elevated remaining senses. Unlike standard genre fare, Daredevil attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Fantasy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Daredevil features a noteworthy lineup led by Ben Affleck . Supported by the likes of Jennifer Garner and Colin Farrell , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Daredevil (2003) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Daredevil is a Fantasy, Action film that transports viewers to imaginative worlds filled with magic, wonder, and epic adventures. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The film presents its narrative with careful attention to pacing and character development. A man blinded in a childhood accident fights crime using his superhumanly-elevated remaining senses. The story unfolds naturally, allowing viewers to become invested in the outcome while maintaining engagement throughout.
The film operates on multiple levels, using its genre framework to explore deeper themes about human nature, society, and the choices that define us.
Ending Breakdown: Daredevil attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to fantasy resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Daredevil reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $78.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $179.2M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Daredevil is $78.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










JioHotstar
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.3/10, and global collection metrics, Daredevil stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2003 cinematic year.
Daredevil has received mixed reviews with a 5.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Daredevil is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Fantasy, Action movies, but read reviews first.
Daredevil is currently available for streaming on JioHotstar. You can also check for it on platforms like JioHotstar depending on your region.
Waste of film stock
It's not just that Daredevil is a poorly made movie. It's that it takes a great character and turns him into a mishmash of tired clichés, shamelessly copying The Crow, Spider-Man, The Matrix, as well as both Burton and Schumacher's Batman in an attempt to appeal to the teen angst crowd. Don't blame Ben Affleck. He does what he can but the script and terrible production design lets him down as much as it us.
**Daredevil is cheesy but trying to be serious while dripping in 2000s grunge. It isn’t a masterpiece, but it was a solid superhero film for its time.** Daredevil (2003) falls prey to a lot of judgment from people who have spent over a decade with Marvel films and The Dark Knight trilogy, but rewind to a time when Blade, X-Men, and Tobey Macguire’s Spider-man were all you had for superhero films, and you might start to see Daredevil for what it was. It was a genuine product of its time - Seether and Evanescence heavily featured on the soundtrack, leather superhero suits, and ridiculous dialogue. Everything was so cheesy in superhero movies at the time - don’t forget that Catwoman came out just a year later. Daredevil tried to be more edgy and gritty than Spider-man at a time when most people still considered superhero movies as kids’ films. It had a lot going against it but still brought together a fantastic cast with Ben Affleck and Colin Farrell at a very popular time in their careers and Jennifer Garner while she was one of the biggest stars on TV. This movie even managed to spawn a spin-off film! Say what you want, but when I saw this movie in 7th grade, I thought Daredevil was one of the coolest superheroes I had ever seen, and even though years later I can see the movie more for what it is - it still holds a special place in my heart.
This film feels longer than just 100 minutes! Ben Affleck ("Matt Murdock") is the eponymous super-hero who is blinded by an accident with some toxic waste but as a result, has acute hearing and sensitivity to movement. He spends his days as a lawyer, his nights à-la "Spiderman" as a bit of a vigilante trying keep the streets of New York's infamous "Hell's Kitchen" clear of criminals. Lately, his sights have become firmly set on the "Kingpin" (Colin Farrell) - the biggest baddie of them all, but a man whom the courts cannot incarcerate. His masked mission now becomes to bring this man to justice. This is a quickly paced, and colourful extravaganza - plenty of action, the visual effects are good and a premiss just a little different. The dialogue is pretty banal, Farrell is dreadful - a ham if I ever I saw one, and the action scenes are just a little bit too repetitive and dull after a while. Affleck brings little charisma to the screen and the romance with Jennifer Garner ("Electric Nachos" - or something similar) was gloopy and dragged the pace down all too often before an ending that, well - is just daft. It's harmless fun but I don't think I would bother watching it again.
While the style and direction are very early 2000s in the superhero genre, I still found this relatively entertaining though seeing this again after many years, don't think Affleck was great in the role, though I did like Jennifer Garner's Elektra. As a side note, I did watch the director's cut. **3.25/5**
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.