Is David Copperfield Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, David Copperfield is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 118 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:David Copperfield is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, TV Movie genre.
Answer: Maybe not, David Copperfield is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 118 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1969, David Copperfield emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, TV Movie domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A young man journeys from a difficult childhood to maturity, exploring social injustice, personal development, and the complexities of human relationships. Unlike standard genre fare, David Copperfield attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and David Copperfield features a noteworthy lineup led by Richard Attenborough . Supported by the likes of Cyril Cusack and Edith Evans , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of David Copperfield (1969) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: David Copperfield is a Drama, TV Movie film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: David Copperfield attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of David Copperfield reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:










Amazon Prime Video
FlixFling
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
FlixFling
Amazon Video
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.4/10, and global collection metrics, David Copperfield stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1969 cinematic year.
David Copperfield has received mixed reviews with a 5.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
David Copperfield is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, TV Movie movies, but read reviews first.
David Copperfield is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, FlixFling, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
This was never one of my favourite Dickens stories - I always found the title character just a bit , well, wet! Anyway, the really quite mediocre Robin Phillips take the role for this adaptation, and we follow his rather brutal adventures of childhood and early adulthood that see him deal with bullying, beating, extortion and tragedy. As with the book, to which this is fairly faithful, there are quite literally heaps of curious and engaging characters he encounters along the way, most notably Sir Ralph Richardson's wonderfully over the top "Micawber", Sir Michael Redgrave's "Peggotty" desperately seeking his errant daughter "Emily" (Sinéad Cusack) and from Ron Roody as the duplicitous, downright nasty piece of work that is "Uriah Heap"! The production is pretty lacklustre. The photography offers us lots of long, moody shots of the contemplative hero on the beach - and the cameraman seems content to try out his new zoom lens just once (or thrice) too often. Malcolm Arnold provides us with an unremarkable score and the whole story irather plods along without much potency. As an introduction to the work of Dickens, it might have a purpose in diverting the viewer to the author's (and his other, better) novels, but a piece of cinema it's little better than a very well cast television movie.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.