Performance & Direction: Decameron Nights Review
Last updated: January 23, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Decameron Nights (1953) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.4/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Adventure.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Decameron Nights features a noteworthy lineup led by Joan Fontaine . Supported by the likes of Louis Jourdan and Binnie Barnes , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Decameron Nights (1953) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Decameron Nights
Quick Plot Summary: Decameron Nights is a Adventure film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Decameron Nights
Ending Breakdown: Decameron Nights attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the adventure themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Decameron Nights reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Decameron Nights?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Adventure films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Decameron Nights
All Cast & Crew →






Where to Watch Decameron Nights Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
fuboTV🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoDecameron Nights Parents Guide & Age Rating
1953 AdvisoryWondering about Decameron Nights age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Decameron Nights is 129 minutes (2h 9m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.4/10, and global collection metrics, Decameron Nights stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1953 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Decameron Nights worth watching?
Decameron Nights is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies. It has a verified rating of 4.4/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Decameron Nights parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Decameron Nights identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Decameron Nights?
The total duration of Decameron Nights is 129 minutes, which is approximately 2h 9m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Decameron Nights
How Decameron Nights Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Decameron Nights
Based on the hugely imaginative work of Giovanni Boccaccio, this is a rather lacklustre effort with Louis Jourdan taking the role of the acclaimed storyteller who is seeking shelter from the pursing troops of the invading Duke of Lorenzo. He has also learned of the location of his love "Fiametta" (Joan Fontaine) but upon arrival at the villa in which she, and four others (including a terribly wooden Joan Collins as "Pampinea") are hiding, he is only permitted to stay with them on the condition that he tells them a story each evening and that he doesn't try to seduce anyone. He agrees, but clearly plans to use his tales to arouse her ardour nonetheless. His stories challenge the strength of her morals, to varying extents: always a young woman married to much older man (always Godfrey Tearle) but the third story comes from the woman herself, and it offers an interestingly juxtaposed position to those presented in his, more opportune, depictions. The stories themselves challenge stereotypes of romance; the place of a woman in the home; the nature of love and honour and loyalty but the film itself falls well short. Fontaine is remarkably sterile and Jourdan, despite his mellifluous tones, lacks charisma. It takes for ever to get going and when we do, it all struggles to animate itself. Much like with Shakespeare, so much of the nuance of the narrative - the descriptive language that is subtle, funny and potent struggles to translate onto a screen at the best of times - and this isn't one of those. His works deserved a much more sensitive and competent adaptation for the screenplay. What we are left with here is just a confused romantic adventure with some seriously undercooked characters across the board. It runs beyond two hours, so there is no real excuse for this short-selling. Pity.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.












