Performance & Direction: Diablo Review
Last updated: January 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Diablo (2016) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.9/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Action.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Diablo features a noteworthy lineup led by Scott Eastwood . Supported by the likes of Walton Goggins and Camilla Belle , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Diablo (2016) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Diablo
Quick Plot Summary: Diablo is a Action, Adventure, Thriller, Western film that delivers highly intense sequences and pulse-pounding confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Diablo
Ending Breakdown: Diablo attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the action themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Diablo reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Diablo?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Action films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Diablo
All Cast & Crew →










Where to Watch Diablo Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeDiablo Parents Guide & Age Rating
2016 AdvisoryWondering about Diablo age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Diablo is 83 minutes (1h 23m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Diablo stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Diablo worth watching?
Diablo is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies. It has a verified rating of 4.9/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Diablo parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Diablo identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Diablo?
The total duration of Diablo is 83 minutes, which is approximately 1h 23m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Diablo
How Diablo Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Diablo
Who would've thought that out of the two Westerns I watched this week, the one starring Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman and Joel Edgerton would be the worse movie. _Diablo_ is far from perfect, and it slumps pretty heavily in the middle. But the opening scene and entire third act had me totally engrossed. The supporting cast of _Diablo_ are all pretty on point. Particularly Walton Goggins. Even Danny Glover who is notorious for phoning it in these days does a good job. Unfortunately, Scott Eastwood in the lead role is abysmal. So poor in fact that it was all that held me back from giving _Diablo_ a "Fresh" rating. _Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
This was a poor implementation of a fascinating concept, thanks in great part to Scott Eastwood's inability to portray a complex character, and an ultimately shallow script. The menacing Ezra needed to be fleshed out substantially more, and the signals of his true connection to Jackson were clumsily handled and incorrectly paced. It's so sad to have wasted an opportunity to create a haunting psychological western. It could have been really, really good. Still, you'll be amazed at how much Scott Eastwood can look like his father. He's near identical in some shots.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









