Diablo Review: Story, Cast, Rating & Final Verdict
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Movie Overview: Diablo
| Movie | Diablo |
| Release Year | 2016 |
| Director | Lawrence Roeck |
| Genre | Action / Adventure / Thriller / Western |
| Runtime | 83 minutes |
| Language | EN |
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Diablo (2016) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.9/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Action.
Cast & Character Study
The performances in Diablo are led by Scott Eastwood . The supporting cast, including Walton Goggins and Camilla Belle , provides the necessary layers to the central narrative.
movieMx Verdict: Is it Worth Your Time?
What Works in the Movie
While Diablo does not fully realize its potential, it still contains moments that may appeal to viewers who enjoy Action films.
- Interesting concept or premise
- Some entertaining scenes
- Supporting cast delivers occasional highlights
What Doesn't Work
Despite its strengths, Diablo has a few issues that may affect the overall viewing experience, particularly in terms of pacing and narrative consistency.
- Uneven pacing in certain parts of the film
- Some predictable plot developments
- May not appeal to audiences outside the Action fanbase
Story & Plot Summary: Diablo
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2016, Diablo is a Action, Adventure, Thriller, Western film directed by Lawrence Roeck. The narrative delivers highly intense sequences and pulse-pounding confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Scott Eastwood.
Ending Explained: Diablo
Diablo Ending Explained: Directed by Lawrence Roeck, Diablo attempts to bring together the film’s narrative threads. The ending highlights the core action themes developed throughout the film.
The final twist encourages viewers to reconsider earlier moments in the story, particularly in scenes involving Scott Eastwood. The interpretation of the ending may vary among viewers.
Key Elements of the Ending
- Narrative Resolution: The story resolves its primary conflict while leaving room for interpretation.
- Character Development: Character motivations become clearer by the final scenes.
- Thematic Message: The ending reinforces the action themes introduced earlier in the film.
The final moments of Diablo reflect the creative choices of the filmmakers and align with the tone of the narrative.
Who Should Watch Diablo?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Action films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Diablo
All Cast & Crew →










Where to Watch Diablo Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeDiablo Parents Guide & Age Rating
2016 AdvisoryWondering about Diablo age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Diablo is 83 minutes (1h 23m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.9/10, and global performance metrics, Diablo is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 2016 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Diablo worth watching?
Diablo is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies. It has a verified rating of 4.9/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Diablo parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Diablo identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Diablo?
The total duration of Diablo is 83 minutes, which is approximately 1h 23m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Diablo
How Diablo Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Diablo
Who would've thought that out of the two Westerns I watched this week, the one starring Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman and Joel Edgerton would be the worse movie. _Diablo_ is far from perfect, and it slumps pretty heavily in the middle. But the opening scene and entire third act had me totally engrossed. The supporting cast of _Diablo_ are all pretty on point. Particularly Walton Goggins. Even Danny Glover who is notorious for phoning it in these days does a good job. Unfortunately, Scott Eastwood in the lead role is abysmal. So poor in fact that it was all that held me back from giving _Diablo_ a "Fresh" rating. _Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
This was a poor implementation of a fascinating concept, thanks in great part to Scott Eastwood's inability to portray a complex character, and an ultimately shallow script. The menacing Ezra needed to be fleshed out substantially more, and the signals of his true connection to Jackson were clumsily handled and incorrectly paced. It's so sad to have wasted an opportunity to create a haunting psychological western. It could have been really, really good. Still, you'll be amazed at how much Scott Eastwood can look like his father. He's near identical in some shots.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










