Is Doomsday Machine Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Doomsday Machine is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 83 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Doomsday Machine is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 3.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Doomsday Machine is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 83 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1972, Doomsday Machine emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Following the discovery of a doomsday machine capable of destroying Earth, the launch of a US space mission to Venus is taken over by the military. Unlike standard genre fare, Doomsday Machine attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Doomsday Machine features a noteworthy lineup led by Bobby Van . Supported by the likes of Ruta Lee and Mala Powers , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Doomsday Machine (1972) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Doomsday Machine is a Science Fiction film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Doomsday Machine attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Doomsday Machine reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.1/10, and global collection metrics, Doomsday Machine stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1972 cinematic year.
Doomsday Machine is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.1/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.1/10, Doomsday Machine may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Doomsday Machine may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I can see the light at the end of the proverbial tunnel, as I'm nearing the end of my infamous Mill Creek 50-film 'Nightmare Worlds' pack. This was a really strange viewing experience, and honestly made me wonder if my red wine had been spiked with some hallucinogen by some ne'er-do-well prankster. It had some intriguing ideas, a big one being that the USA and USSR are afraid that China is going to destroy the world, so at the last minute, just before a scheduled space flight to investigate Venus, NASA administrators replace three of the astronauts with female counterparts, and include a mysterious large suitcase. Though it says 1972, you can distinctly feel that it was made years earlier, before the game-changers of '2001: A Space Odyssey' and the manned space flight to the moon completely changed the way sci-fi films were made (unless you're the sad saps behind monstrosities such as 'Star Odyssey', that go on as if any relationship with the way things are in real life is an entirely accidental and unintended coincidence). Most of it was made in 1966, but funding ran out, and it shows. The filmmakers couldn't even afford the intended climax, and that shows--the film simply ends. But for all of that, this bizarre experiment of a forced Adam and Eve scenario in outer space, as a future for Earth, is decent--and it would be two generations later, when in Christopher Nolan's 'Interstellar', that this idea would be fully realized with human decency and artistic integrity.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.