Is Dracula 3D Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Dracula 3D is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 110 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Dracula 3D is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 3.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Dracula 3D is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 110 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2012, Dracula 3D emerges as a significant entry in the Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of When Englishman Jonathan Harker visits the exotic castle of Count Dracula, he is entranced by the mysterious aristocrat. Unlike standard genre fare, Dracula 3D attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Dracula 3D features a noteworthy lineup led by Thomas Kretschmann . Supported by the likes of Asia Argento and Rutger Hauer , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Dracula 3D (2012) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Dracula 3D is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Dracula 3D attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Dracula 3D reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $7.7M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Dracula 3D is $7.7M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Philo
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.5/10, and global collection metrics, Dracula 3D stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2012 cinematic year.
Dracula 3D is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.5/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.5/10, Dracula 3D may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Dracula 3D is currently available for streaming on Philo. You can also check for it on platforms like Philo depending on your region.
Sadly there's a lot of over-acting in this movie. There's also a lot of bad acting in this movie. They didn't go back into Dracula's past like other versions. Lots of titties in this which is rather cliche. The story kind of jumped around a lot, kind of felt like bits and pieces being thrown together. A couple of cool effects that I wish could be brought to a more Dynamic story and better cast. This wasn't a b horror movie I don't even think I'd Classify it as a c horror movie. I think it's more of a d horror movie. Honestly I can see the cast portray the characters they played but just with a better script and better Direction. Honestly this was below every actor that was in it. So sorry to say.
"Hey Dad!", says daughter Asia to father Dario - "I'd love to be in a "Dracula" movie." "Oh, ok then", he retorts. "I can arrange that. Even better - why not do it in 3D?". A few friendly phone calls later and we end up with this cringeworthy television-style movie that purports to be sexy but is actually a rather sleazy and uninspired remake of a story that has already been, quite literally, done to death. The wooden and uncharismatic Unax Ugalde is the "Jonathan Harker" character who travels to visit the eponymous Count (a completely non-menacing Thomas Kretschmann) in his remote castle and that is where they all ought to have stayed. The rest of this follows the standard format as his wife "Mina" (Marta Gastini) becomes the object of the insatiable desire of his blood sucking host. Panic stricken, he turns to the clearly down-on-his luck Rutger Hauer ("Van Helsing") to step in and try to save the day, and the young couple, before they, too, become creatures of the night. The whole thing makes Hammer look like Fellini. The make up and effects are straight out of a toothpaste tube (or ketchup bottle), the dialogue is as flat as a pancake and the entire enterprise has an almost risible sterility to it that starts off mildly amusing but ends up hammy and nigh-on unwatchable. Even for the most ardent fans of the "Dracula" stories, this is will be a struggle and maybe one to just avoid.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.