Performance & Direction: Dreamaniac Review
Last updated: January 22, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Dreamaniac (1986) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 3.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Dreamaniac features a noteworthy lineup led by Thomas Bern . Supported by the likes of Ashlyn Gere and Sylvia Summers , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Dreamaniac (1986) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Dreamaniac
Quick Plot Summary: Dreamaniac is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Dreamaniac
Ending Breakdown: Dreamaniac attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Dreamaniac reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Dreamaniac?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Dreamaniac
All Cast & Crew →

Where to Watch Dreamaniac Online?
Streaming HubDreamaniac Parents Guide & Age Rating
1986 AdvisoryWondering about Dreamaniac age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Dreamaniac is 82 minutes (1h 22m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.8/10, and global collection metrics, Dreamaniac stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1986 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dreamaniac worth watching?
Dreamaniac is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 3.8/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Dreamaniac parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Dreamaniac identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Dreamaniac?
The total duration of Dreamaniac is 82 minutes, which is approximately 1h 22m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Dreamaniac
How Dreamaniac Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Dreamaniac
**_One dimensional cabin-in-the-woods Indie with a succubus_** A college-age musician/writer rents a house to get some work done, but his girlfriend insists on throwing a sorority party with guest frat boys. Things go awry, however, when a succubus crashes the party. “Dreamaniac” (1986) was the director’s first real film and originally called “Succubus,” but this changed after the success of “A Nightmare on Elm Street,” which explains the tagline: ‘You don't have to live on Elm Street to have a nightmare.’ While it opens with a dark dream and there are surreal moments reminiscent of that popular film & franchise, it’s at heart a cabin-in-the-woods slasher with the variation of a succubus as the antagonist. The problem is that it’s too one-note. The entire movie takes place in this house, mostly at night, which can be explained by the budget of $60,000 (equivalent to $176,000 today, factoring inflation). In other words, the production didn’t have the funds for multiple locations. So, the events in the house had better be interesting enough to maintain the viewer’s interest, but that’s hardly the case. The 80’s ambiance is great, though, and the gore’s well done, if that’s your thang. Plus, there are several good-lookin’ females, such as Kim McKamy as Pat (aka Ashlyn Gere), Sylvia Summers as Lily and Linda Watts as Jan (aka Linda Denise Martin), not to mention a couple of amusingly obnoxious ones, like Cynthia Crass as Francis. But the flick’s strapped with too much male nudity (which is unsurprising given the director’s orientation). The few positives simply aren’t enough to make it worth the time. Speaking of which… It runs 1 hour, 22 minutes, and was shot in Los Angeles. GRADE: C-/D+
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.







