Is Dreams Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Dreams is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Dreams is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.0/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Drama, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Dreams is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1955, Dreams emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two different women – a young photo model and her boss – dream about a happy life with beloved men. Unlike standard genre fare, Dreams attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Dreams features a noteworthy lineup led by Eva Dahlbeck . Supported by the likes of Harriet Andersson and Gunnar Björnstrand , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Dreams (1955) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Dreams is a Drama, Romance film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Dreams resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Dreams reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:









Criterion Channel
Apple TV
Fandango At Home
Apple TV
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7/10, and global collection metrics, Dreams stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1955 cinematic year.
Dreams is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Drama, Romance movies.
Yes, Dreams is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Drama, Romance cinema.
Dreams is currently available for streaming on Criterion Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Criterion Channel depending on your region.
Ingmar Bergman's 1955 film KVINNODRÖM ("Women's Dreams", released in the English-speaking world as simply "Dreams") has two interwoven plots that each involve a woman coming face to face with her aspirations to love and romance and being disappointed. Susanne (Eva Dahlbeck) runs an agency for fashion models in Stockholm, but she is distracted from work by an obsession with a married man (played by Ulf Palme) whose mistress she once was. Though the affair has been cut off, Susanne continues to stalk him. Meanwhile, one her models, Doris (Harriet Andersson) is seduced by a rich old man (Gunnar Björnstrand) who identifies her love of expensive clothes and jewelry as her weak spot. The 1950s were anni mirabili for Ingmar Bergman, when he was increasingly cementing a reputation as one of the finest filmmakers in the world. Though this 1955 effort came out right in the middle of such legendary achievements as "Summer with Monika", "Sawdust and Tinsel", and "The Seventh Seal", it has never been considered one of Bergman's better films, and there hasn't even been much of a push to recognize it as a lost masterpiece like some other lesser-known works of this period. The plot revisits already well-worth themes. Plus, I was very underwhelmed by the initial minutes of the film, which sinks into pure melodrama at one point as Susanne agonizes on a train and considers suicide. The film is shot in a dry, realistic style and lacks the dazzling effects that Bergman had already begun to employ. However, the film is certainly worthwhile for established fans of Bergman through the performances he evokes from the actors. Dahlbeck, who was considered quite a great talent and beauty in her day, leaves me cold, but Ulf Palme elicits simultaneous sympathy and disgust as the henpecked husband that Sussane has an affair with. Inga Landgré's small but climactic part as the man's wife thrills with her composed delivery of devastating lines. The real stars of the film, however, are Andersson and Björnstrand. Harriet Andersson was a sex bomb, and often played roles that capitalized on that, but here her ditzy Doris is a full-fledged character of her own, different from Andersson's appearances in other Bergman films. She also knows how to drive so much of the interpersonal action with her deft facial expressions alone. Björnstrand is admirable for the charm and grace he shows as the old seducer, and with poise he gradually shows the cracks in the façade as their fling might not have been a good idea after all.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.