Is Due Date Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Due Date is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Due Date is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Drama genre.
Answer: Yes, Due Date is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2010, Due Date emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Peter Highman must scramble across the US in five days to be present for the birth of his first child. Unlike standard genre fare, Due Date attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Due Date features a noteworthy lineup led by Robert Downey Jr. . Supported by the likes of Zach Galifianakis and Michelle Monaghan , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Due Date (2010) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Due Date is a Comedy, Drama film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The comedic structure relies on both situational humor and character-based comedy. Peter Highman must scramble across the US in five days to be present for the birth of his first child. He gets off to a bad start when his wallet and luggage are stolen, and put on the 'no-fly' list. Peter embarks on a terrifying journey when he accepts a ride from an actor. The film finds humor in relatable situations while maintaining narrative momentum. The jokes serve the story, with callbacks and running gags that reward attentive viewers.
The film operates on multiple levels, using its genre framework to explore deeper themes about human nature, society, and the choices that define us.
Ending Breakdown: Due Date concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Due Date reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $65.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $211.8M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Due Date is $65.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.4/10, and global collection metrics, Due Date stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2010 cinematic year.
Due Date has received mixed reviews with a 6.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Due Date is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Drama movies, but read reviews first.
Due Date may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I really wanted to watch this movie mainly because of Robert Downy Jr. Just looking at the poster...he's hot! So the movie is funny but not LMAO-funny. It has a touching side to it. Of course, I felt so happy seeing Robert Downey Jr. just being his plain hot self. He looks good when he's clean and he looks good when he's dirty. And then there's Zach Galifianakis. I loved him in Hangover. He's super funny there. But I was surprised to watch him in this movie because not only is he in his funny self, he did a couple of crying scenes which were touching. This movie is tiring. YES. Tiring. All the adventures and misadventures that they had made me really tired. My rate for this movie is B+. I can never give Robert a low rating hehehe.
A generic road trip movie with two terrible people who continuously make bad choices in a predictable plot rife with even more predictable "gags". Galifianakis portrays an even dumber and less funny version of the Hangover while Downey plays a less intelligent and less humorous version of Tony Stark. Seriously, it isn't worth your time. If you want a funny road trip film then go watch 'Planes, Trains and Automobiles' instead. Doesn't matter if you've seen it before. You will still feel a lot happier than if you had wasted your life on this film.
Decent watch, probably won't watch again, and can't whole-heartedly recommend. This is an interesting movie to look at critically. The writing, mostly in the character work, feels weak. It actually has an interesting plot, for the most part: an idiot, through deceit, drags a jerk with him on a cross country road trip. It's a decent story, and I'd like to think of it as an spiritual predecessor to "The Hangover". The problem I have with it is that it feels like if there were better actors, then the characters would sell better. Then I remember it was Robert Downey Jr and Zach Galifinakas, and I'm not sure how much "better" you can get for these characters, meaning that they've probably already elevated the characters somewhat. It feels like a lot of the movie is unnecessary, like antithetical Chekov's guns. Either it's for a tiny one time joke with little payoff, or it's part of a lot of work for situational comedy. An example would be the dog, it really only has one significant joke in the entire movie (maybe 2), otherwise it's just a lot of maintenance. The coffee can on the other hand is repetitively used to throughout the movie as it's part of the character themes. I'm not saying it's not funny, if you like "Anger Management", then you might like this one, but I just think there are a lot better movies out there to watch.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.