Verdict:Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Adventure, Fantasy, TV Movie genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 105 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2005, Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Adventure, Fantasy, TV Movie domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Due to a curse from his former master Profion, Damodar survived his death by Ridley Freeborn as an undead entity in pursuit of an evil artifact for some hundred years, so that he might be capable of unleashing unstoppable destruction on Izmir and the descendants of those who caused his demise. Unlike standard genre fare, Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God features a noteworthy lineup led by Bruce Payne . Supported by the likes of Mark Dymond and Clemency Burton-Hill , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God (2005) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God is a Action, Adventure, Fantasy, TV Movie film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Apple TV
VideobusterAmazon VideoApple TVVideobusterAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.7/10, and global collection metrics, Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2005 cinematic year.
Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.7/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.7/10, Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
You want Dungeons and Dragons? You got it. RELEASD TO TV IN 2005 and directed by Gerry Lively, "Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God" amasses a good group of protagonists who seek to find some magical black orb and save their kingdom, Ismir, from the wrath of a malevolent dragon slumbering in a nearby mountain. This involves an evil wizard, Damodar, played by Bruce Payne, who is the only one to return from the first D&D film from 2000. I liked the whole adventure-quest aspect of the story and the colorful group of characters who join together to defeat the wizard and save the kingdom: A noble ex-knight statesman (Mark Dymond), a cleric (Steven Elder), a rogue (Tim Stern), a hot warrior woman (Ellie Chidzey) and an elf girl mage (Lucy Gaskell). The stunning Clemency Burton-Hill is also on hand as the nobleman's wife who does her part to help save Ismir. The towering Chidzey (5’11”) is nice & curvy rather than unappealingly thin, like the stereotypical model. Although I've never played Dungeons & Dragons, I read one of the books years ago and numerous others from the sword & sorcery genre, especially Conan, Gor and ERB, not to mention numerous sword & sorcery flicks (some being sword & NO sorcery, like "First Knight" and "King Arthur," lol). Anyway, this second “Dungeons & Dragon” movie works just good enough for me to give it a decent grade. Although it was relatively low-budget (I’m actually surprised it cost $15 million) it's generally superior to the typical Syfy fare and thoroughly austere compared to the campy first film. I liked how the writers actually threw in some nice character bits, like the developing friendship/respect of the rogue and the barbarian. They should've included more. "Dungeons & Dragons" is a fitting title because you get your fill of both. There are numerous dungeon scenes with torches and secret passageways, as well as two impressive dragon sequences, one featuring an ice dragon and another with the mountain dragon who looks like Satan himself. On top of this you get some quality forest locations and Medieval sets. THE FILM RUNS 105 minutes was shot in Lithuania. WRITERS: Robert Kimmel, Lively (the director) and Brian Rudnick. GRADE: B-
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise
