Is Eagle vs Shark Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Eagle vs Shark is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Eagle vs Shark is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Eagle vs Shark is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2007, Eagle vs Shark emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Love blossoms for Lily over double Meaty Boy burgers at mid-day when uber-computer nerd Jarrod comes in and leaves with free extra large fries. Unlike standard genre fare, Eagle vs Shark attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Eagle vs Shark features a noteworthy lineup led by Loren Taylor . Supported by the likes of Jemaine Clement and Joel Tobeck , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Eagle vs Shark (2007) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Eagle vs Shark is a Comedy, Romance film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Eagle vs Shark concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Eagle vs Shark reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $1.3M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |









MUBI
MUBI Amazon Channel
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.5/10, and global collection metrics, Eagle vs Shark stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2007 cinematic year.
Eagle vs Shark has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Eagle vs Shark is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Eagle vs Shark is currently available for streaming on MUBI. You can also check for it on platforms like MUBI, MUBI Amazon Channel depending on your region.
Before Taika Waititi became the maestro of cosmic absurdity in Thor: Ragnarok or crafted the poignant satire of Jojo Rabbit, he gave us this modest, peculiar gem; a story about two magnificently awkward people fumbling toward something resembling connection. Eagle vs Shark is his feature debut, and while it lacks the refinement and assurance of his later work, it already contains his essential DNA: that off-kilter humor, that bone-dry sarcasm, that willingness to find both comedy and compassion in human ridiculousness. Every character here is nerdy, needy, warped, broken in some fundamental way. Lily, played with heartbreaking precision by Loren Horsley (who co-wrote the script), works at a fast-food restaurant and pines for Jarrod, the video game store clerk portrayed by Jemaine Clement with aggressive obliviousness. Jarrod is planning a costume party; when Lily shows up dressed as a shark to his eagle, the film's title becomes a visual echo of Sholom Aleichem's ancient wisdom: "A bird may love a fish but where would they build a home together?" No one in this film is cool, no one has their life together, no one would be mistaken for the protagonist of a conventional romance. And that's precisely the point. Waititi holds up a human mirror here, asking the question that hovers over all his best work: who among us is the perfect person? Who among us isn't nursing some wound, some delusion, some desperate hunger for validation? Jarrod's quest for revenge against his high school bully becomes pathetic and revealing; his treatment of Lily veers between casual cruelty and genuine need. Yet Horsley's performance keeps us invested, her Lily so endearing, so quietly resilient, that we root for her even when the film's quirky aesthetic threatens to tip into preciousness. Is it as accomplished as Hunt for the Wilderpeople or What We Do in the Shadows? No. But it's still quite funny, still genuinely moving when it needs to be, still confident enough in its strangeness to resist easy resolution. Horsley and Clement execute their roles with exactness, creating characters who could have been insufferable but instead become oddly lovable. By the end, you believe these two damaged people might actually make it work, not because they've been healed but because they've found someone equally unhealed to share the wreckage with. That's a delightful watch, and a generous vision of love.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.