Is Elvira's Haunted Hills Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Elvira's Haunted Hills is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Elvira's Haunted Hills is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Elvira's Haunted Hills is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2002, Elvira's Haunted Hills emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The setting is Carpathia. Unlike standard genre fare, Elvira's Haunted Hills attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Elvira's Haunted Hills features a noteworthy lineup led by Cassandra Peterson . Supported by the likes of Mary Jo Smith and Richard O'Brien , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Elvira's Haunted Hills (2002) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Elvira's Haunted Hills is a Comedy, Horror film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Elvira's Haunted Hills attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Elvira's Haunted Hills reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $1.5M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Elvira's Haunted Hills is $1.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.






Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.5/10, and global collection metrics, Elvira's Haunted Hills stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2002 cinematic year.
Elvira's Haunted Hills has received mixed reviews with a 5.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Elvira's Haunted Hills is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Horror movies, but read reviews first.
Elvira's Haunted Hills may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
_**Elvira returns to the silver screen after 13 years**_ Elvira (Cassandra Peterson) is traveling through the Carpathian Mountains in 1851 with her servant (Mary Jo Smith). They’re on their way to Paris when they’re invited to spend the night at the creepy Hellsubus castle by a physician (Scott Atkinson). Richard O'Brien plays the tormented lord of the manor while Mary Scheer appears as his dubious wife. Heather Hopper is on hand as their cute niece, the poster child for catalepsy. “Elvira’s Haunted Hills” (2001) is the follow-up to “Elvira, Mistress of the Dark” (1988), the latter of which was a fun flick but failed at the box office due to its main distributing company going under just before it was scheduled to be released (it was supposed to show at 2500 theaters, but only made it to 500). Cassandra couldn’t get studio funding for this prequel and so she & her then-husband put up $1 million with an additional $500,000 from relatives. As such, this movie cost 6 times LESS than the previous one from 13 years earlier (factoring in inflation). While there’s a 13 year gap between these two films and Cassandra was 49 years-old during shooting, you wouldn’t know it by her fit form & all-around animated beauty. Another plus is the authentic Transylvania locations with a real castle (although the indoor scenes were obviously shot on studio sets). Despite the gross lack of funds compared to the prior movie, this one proves to be colorful and entertaining if you appreciate the eye-rolling goofy humor associated with Elvira. While the former flick is technically better due to having way more funds to work with, I like this one more as far as all-around entertainment goes. I suppose it’s because I favor the setting, which parodies 60’s horror flicks, like “The Pit and the Pendulum” (1961), “The Terror” (1963) and “Dracula, Prince of Darkness” (1966). It recalls horror send-ups “The Fearless Vampire Killers” (1967) and “Young Frankenstein” (1974), but I actually prefer this one despite the much lower budget and lack of ‘stars.’ The film runs 1 hour, 30 minutes, and was shot in Transylvania, Romania, with studio work done in Bucharest. GRADE: B-
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise