Is Extraction Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Extraction is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Extraction is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Extraction is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2015, Extraction emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of When a former CIA operative is kidnapped by a group of terrorists, his son learns there is no plan for his father to be saved—so he launches his own rescue operation. Unlike standard genre fare, Extraction attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Extraction features a noteworthy lineup led by Bruce Willis . Supported by the likes of Gina Carano and Kellan Lutz , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Extraction (2015) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Extraction is a Action, Thriller film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Extraction attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Extraction reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $16.8K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.5/10, and global collection metrics, Extraction stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2015 cinematic year.
Extraction is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.5/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.5/10, Extraction may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Extraction may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Good watch, probably won't watch again, but can recommend. I love any chance I get to see Gina Carano in action, but Kellan Lutz carries the majority of the movie with Bruce Willis and Carano in more of a support capacity. For an action movie, it's pretty good, the problem is that it is a spy movie. It's all about intel, it's focused on the CIA, but for some reason we keep presenting the CIA as a private army instead of a foreign based intelligence agency (like an overseas FBI, but without guns). Even "assets", like assassins, are technically outsourced and aren't supposed to be available in country. The motivation of an "all hack" device isn't quite enough for me, and the action is mediocre compared to most action films, but very well done. The most interesting parts of the movie are the "spoiler" bits, so there is something extra to what I see as a very bland main plot, but all in all it's a very average, if good, movie experience.
I didn't find 'Extraction' to be that bad at all, it's not good either but it's definitely nothing terrible. I found it an OK, relatively well paced full on action film. It is, I will say, one of those productions that big up a well known actor, in this case Bruce Willis, yet they actually don't even feature much. That's a negative for sure, like why would you have Willis and not make him the main attraction - most likely down to financial/scheduling issues, but still. Kellan Lutz is very much the lead in this and I think he does a solid enough job, as does 'Fast & Furious' alum Gina Carano. Talking of alumni, 'The Walking Dead' duo Steve Coulter and Joshua Mikel appear. I agree the story is nothing exciting or thrilling, but I honestly didn't have much of problem whilst watching it. It's hollow, but nothing awful - in my opinion, anyway. If you're looking for a good action film with this title, check out the 2020 release with Chris Hemsworth - it's certainly much better.
Besides being one of the worst action films I have ever had the displeasure of viewing, can we please stop putting Dan Bilzerian's name in the opening credits for nothing roles? Instant devaluing of a film by bringing in a nobody who epitomizes lazy film-making and is a wannabe playboy who probably wasn't held by his mother enough growing up.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.