Is Final Analysis Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Final Analysis is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 124 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Final Analysis is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Thriller, Romance genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Final Analysis is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 124 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1992, Final Analysis emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Thriller, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A psychiatrist becomes romantically involved with the sister of one of his patients, but the influence of her controlling gangster husband threatens to destroy them both. Unlike standard genre fare, Final Analysis attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Final Analysis features a noteworthy lineup led by Richard Gere . Supported by the likes of Kim Basinger and Uma Thurman , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Final Analysis (1992) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Final Analysis is a Drama, Thriller, Romance film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Final Analysis attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Final Analysis reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $32.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $28.6M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Final Analysis is $32.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










FilmBox+Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, Final Analysis stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1992 cinematic year.
Final Analysis has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Final Analysis is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Thriller, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Final Analysis is currently available for streaming on FilmBox+. You can also check for it on platforms like FilmBox+ depending on your region.
Pathological Intoxication and the Freudian Flower Arranging Theory. Final Analysis is directed by Phil Joanou and written by Robert Berger and Wesley Strick. It stars Richard Gere, Kim Basinger, Uma Thurman, Eric Roberts, Keith David, Paul Guilfoyle and Robert Harper. Music is by George Fenton and cinematography by Jordan Cronenweth. A psychiatrist becomes romantically involved with the sister of one of his patients... There comes a time in every film fan's life - those who commit to writing reviews, starting blogs etc - where you happen upon a film that you find oneself very much going against the general consensus grain, Final Analysis is one such film for myself. Not that it's a great under appreciated gem or anything like that, but revisiting some 25 plus years later I have found it to be far better than I found it back in the day. Alfred Hitchcock is my absolute number one favourite director of all time, but I'm never closed off as many often are to any sort of homage or thematically charged movie in lieu of the great man. In fact I'm encouraged that he still influences modern day directors this way. It also helps me that for fifteen years I have buried myself in all things film noir, which has given me opportunities to pick out fine noirish traits in otherwise reviled films of the neo-noir type. Case for the defence closed then!. Final Analysis is very Hitchcockian but lite, so much so it plays as "Vertigo's" illegitimate offspring. In fact it's even De Palma lite, who was one of the best exponents of Hitch type suspensers. It's a little clumsy at times and trips itself up, with director Joanou failing to build on the promise of his neo-noir of 1990 - the blistering "State of Grace". While stretching it out to a two hour run time by throwing twist after twist at it - when the writing isn't good enough to veer away from Hitchcock conventions, is a bad move. However, the core basis of a film noir world painted here is quite vivid, with two femme fatales, Freudian splinters and many trawls down a murky dark lane of mystery. The look is terrific (various Calif locations), this does after all feature the work of the cinematographer who photographed "Blade Runner". There a numerous gorgeous shots, light filtered through slats, up tilts into spiral golds, sublime primaries, while the court room sequences are magnificently akin to something that "Roger Deakins" would achieve further down the line. Cast performance wise it's not something to shout from the rooftops about, but nothing that hurts the pic. I'm a big fan of Gere, but here he's on auto-pilot, which is where Joanou should have earnt his corn. Basinger sexes it up and does good enough crafty, but it's a turn that doesn't come alive till late in the day, likewise Thurman in the sister role. David isn't in it enough and just seems to serve as a point of reference at various junctures, but faring much better are Roberts (super smarm charm with deadly heartbeats), and Guilfoyle as the lawyer balancing court determination with private yearnings. I couldn't recommend with utter confidence, but I would suggest that neo-noir/Hitchcock fans may find a revisit more beneficial when picking through the bones of it. 7/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.