Is Flame Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Flame is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Verdict:Flame is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Flame is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1964, Flame emerges as a significant entry in the Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of complex human dynamics and high-stakes drama. Unlike standard genre fare, Flame attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Flame features a noteworthy lineup led by Shoukry Sarhan . Supported by the likes of Samira Ahmed and Tawfiq Al-Deqen , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Flame (1964) is negative. With an audience rating of NR, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Flame is a Crime film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Flame attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Flame reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Flame incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Flame adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:






Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Flame stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1964 cinematic year.
Flame is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Flame may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Flame may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.