Is Forbidden World Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Forbidden World is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 77 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Forbidden World is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Forbidden World is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 77 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1982, Forbidden World emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In the distant future, a federation marshal arrives at a research lab on a remote planet where a genetic experiment has gotten loose and begins feeding on the dwindling scientific group. Unlike standard genre fare, Forbidden World attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Forbidden World features a noteworthy lineup led by Jesse Vint . Supported by the likes of Dawn Dunlap and June Chadwick , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Forbidden World (1982) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Forbidden World is a Horror, Science Fiction film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Forbidden World attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Forbidden World reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:








Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.2/10, and global collection metrics, Forbidden World stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1982 cinematic year.
Forbidden World has received mixed reviews with a 5.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Forbidden World is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Science Fiction movies, but read reviews first.
Forbidden World may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_Another Corman-produced knockoff of “Alien,” with softcore_** In the distant future, a troubleshooting flying ace (Jesse Vint) is redirected to a remote desert planet in order to help a bio-engineering team deal with a mutating organism. “Forbidden World” (1982) is the second “Alien” knockoff produced by Roger Corman and even uses some of the sets of the previous one from the year prior, “Galaxy of Terror” (as well as some space F/X from “Battle Beyond the Stars”). Other than that, the films aren’t connected. While my title blurb is condescending, Ridley Scott’s iconic movie itself ripped-off every main aspect of the first half of “Planet of the Vampires” from 1965, aka “Terror in Space.” So it wasn't exactly original, although it was well-done and superior. Like “Galaxy of Terror,” there’s a comic book flair to the proceedings that “Alien” lacked (because of its blockbuster budget). Still, if you like the grim adult-oriented science fiction of that film, you should appreciate this one (and “Galaxy”). The problem is that the monster in the last act looks cheesy in the manner of something borrowed from “Little Shop of Horrors,” although up to that point the various mutations are effective, particularly for a Corman-budgeted flick. “Alien” featured statuesque but too-thin Sigourney Weaver in her underwear in the last act and so Corman upped the ante with the two females here, shown pretty much fully nude in some scenes, with 1-2 sex-oriented sequences. The joke is that the tagline was “In space no one can hear you get naked.” Obviously, you should stay away if that’s disagreeable to you. The aforementioned two females happen to be Dawn Dunlap (Tracy), who was only 17 during shooting in October, 1981, while blonde June Chadwick (Barbara) was a month shy of 30. The nudity can be criticized as exploitive, of course, but there’s another way of looking at it. It drives home how people stuck on a remote station in the galaxy would still function like everyday people on Earth: sleeping in light clothing, walking around in their underwear or a robe, bathing, using a sauna, having sex and so forth. In other word, people are people, even 100-200 years in the future in outer space with the great technology thereof. The movie runs 1 hour, 17 minutes, and was shot at Corman's studio in Venice, California, his “renowned lumberyard facility,” as well as Vasquez Rocks in Agua Dulce for the outside scenes. GRADE: B-/C+
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.