Is Four Sided Triangle Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Four Sided Triangle is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 81 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Four Sided Triangle is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Four Sided Triangle is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 81 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1953, Four Sided Triangle emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A young man, in love with a woman who can never be his, discovers a way to fulfil his dreams. Unlike standard genre fare, Four Sided Triangle attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Four Sided Triangle features a noteworthy lineup led by Barbara Payton . Supported by the likes of James Hayter and Stephen Murray , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Four Sided Triangle (1953) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Four Sided Triangle is a Science Fiction, Romance film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Four Sided Triangle concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Four Sided Triangle reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:






Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, Four Sided Triangle stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1953 cinematic year.
Four Sided Triangle has received mixed reviews with a 6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Four Sided Triangle is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Science Fiction, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Four Sided Triangle may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
For a while, this first Hammer sci-fi offering is actually quite interesting: two childhood friends develop a machine that can replicate anything - animal, vegetable, mineral - you name it. When "Robin" (John van Eyssen) marries their childhood friend "Lena" (Barbara Peyton) his co-developer, "Bill" (Stephen Murray) contrives to makes an identical version of his own whom he calls "Helen". Now the fly in his ointment is that "Helen" is too good a duplicate - unfortunately she loves his mate too - and so poor old "Bill" is faced with a real dilemma. The story is quite fun, but the acting is pretty mediocre and the dialogue a bit too staccato to keep the story flowing. The effects, such as they are, are a bit on the basic side too with sets that wobble and glow like an old edition of "Dr. Who". It's not terrible, and as a first effort in his genre from a studio far better versed in horror genres, is an ok watch from writer/director Terence Fisher.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.