Is Frozen Assets Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Frozen Assets is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Frozen Assets is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 3.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Frozen Assets is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1992, Frozen Assets emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Zach Shepard is excited to find he's been hired as president of a bank. Unlike standard genre fare, Frozen Assets attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Frozen Assets features a noteworthy lineup led by Shelley Long . Supported by the likes of Corbin Bernsen and Teri Copley , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Frozen Assets (1992) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Frozen Assets is a Comedy film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Frozen Assets attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Frozen Assets reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.2/10, and global collection metrics, Frozen Assets stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1992 cinematic year.
Frozen Assets is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.2/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.2/10, Frozen Assets may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Frozen Assets may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Siskel and Ebert said this was the worst movie they had ever seen and one of them was so depressed. They wanted to stop watching movies. So naturally, I had to check it out. The opening scene set the standard, a low brow comedy, so I wasn’t expecting much. However I was surprised at the number of chuckles I got. No outright laughing and jumping for joy, but generally fun. The ridiculous in the end, seem quite different than the majority of the movie, but I think it fit , and this is exactly the type of movie I would be looking for on TV at 2 AM if this were 20 years ago.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.