Is Fuzz Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Fuzz is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Fuzz is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Crime, Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Fuzz is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1972, Fuzz emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Crime, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Police in Boston search for a mad bomber trying to extort money from the city. Unlike standard genre fare, Fuzz attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Fuzz features a noteworthy lineup led by Burt Reynolds . Supported by the likes of Jack Weston and Tom Skerritt , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Fuzz (1972) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Fuzz is a Comedy, Crime, Drama film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Fuzz attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Fuzz reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Fuzz incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a comedy, crime, drama film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Fuzz adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:









fuboTV
MGM+ Amazon Channel
MGM Plus
PhiloAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.4/10, and global collection metrics, Fuzz stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1972 cinematic year.
Fuzz has received mixed reviews with a 5.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Fuzz is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Crime, Drama movies, but read reviews first.
Fuzz is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV, MGM+ Amazon Channel, MGM Plus, Philo depending on your region.
_**87th Precinct yarn set in Boston with Burt Reynolds, Tom Skerritt and Raquel Welch**_ Detectives in Boston have to deal with several typical crime issues in the big city, including a money-hungry killer bomber (Yul Brynner). Burt Reynolds, Tom Skerritt, Raquel Welch and Jack Weston head the cast. "Fuzz" (1972) is an 87th Precinct tale based on the book of the same name and written by the author, Evan Hunter, aka Ed McBain. It’s similar in some ways to other big city detective flicks of that era, like “Bullitt” (1968), Dirty Harry (1971), “The Night Stalker” (1972) and “Deathwish” (1974), but it’s easily the least of these because (1) the attempt to shoehorn humor into the life-or-death proceedings, à la “M*A*S*H” (1972), seems forced and (2) the script tries to juggle too many separate incidents with too many characters. One example of the strained humor is the painters working in the headquarters throughout. But some of the humor works. If they would’ve toned down these kinds of artificialities the movie would’ve worked better. But working out the kinks in scripts take time and time means money. In any case, if you can adapt to the movie’s peculiar tone there’s a lot to appreciate here, including the great cast, which includes many recognizable faces, like Charles Martin Smith, Steve Ihnat and Cal Bellini. It’s also worth noting that the film gets better as it moves along with the last act being the best. It was the obvious inspiration for the TV show Hill Street Blues. Fifteen months after its release, 24 year-old Evelyn Wagler was shockingly murdered in the rundown Blue Hill district of Boston in what might have been a copycat crime based on this movies’ depiction of bums doused with gasoline and set ablaze. What made this incident worse was that it appeared to be a racial hate crime, the victim being white and the six teen perps being black, as witnessed by Wagler before she succumbed to her injuries four hours after the crime. The thug scum were never caught. The movie runs 1 hour, 32 minutes. GRADE: B-/C+
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.