Is Gazer Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Gazer is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Mystery movies.
It features a runtime of 114 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Gazer is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Mystery, Thriller, Horror genre.
Answer: Yes, Gazer is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Mystery movies.
It features a runtime of 114 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2025, Gazer emerges as a significant entry in the Mystery, Thriller, Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Frankie, a young mother with dyschronometria, struggles to perceive time. Unlike standard genre fare, Gazer attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Mystery is often anchored by its ensemble, and Gazer features a noteworthy lineup led by Ariella Mastroianni . Supported by the likes of Marcia DeBonis and Renee Gagner , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Gazer (2025) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Gazer is a Mystery, Thriller, Horror film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Gazer concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to mystery resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Gazer reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $80.0K |
| Worldwide Gross | $38.8K |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Gazer is $80.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.9/10, and global collection metrics, Gazer stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2025 cinematic year.
Gazer has received mixed reviews with a 6.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Gazer is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Mystery, Thriller, Horror movies, but read reviews first.
Gazer may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
One of the cardinal sins in making a captivating thriller is overstuffing the picture with too many story elements, making what should be something intriguing into something muddled, difficult to follow and unfulfilling. That can be made all the worse by incorporating extraneous filler that amounts to little more than padding while unsuccessfully trying to pass itself off as something allegedly poignant and meaningful to the overall story. And, if the filmmaker throws in some poor, at times unintelligible sound quality for good measure, you’ve got a recipe for a production that misses the mark by a decidedly wide margin. That, unfortunately, is the case with writer-director Ryan J. Sloan’s debut feature, an overlong slog that starts out well but overstays its welcome for all of the foregoing reasons. Frankie Rhodes (Ariela Mastroianni), a widowed single mother struggling with financial difficulties, custody issues involving her young daughter and a terminal illness that’s causing declining cognitive impairment, struggles to cope with these challenges but often to no avail. However, when she meets a mysterious woman (Renee Gagner) who promises her a financial windfall to help her out of a bind, Frankie jumps at the chance, only to find herself unwittingly caught up in a web of deceit and criminality in which she becomes the suspected culprit. If the story were left at that, it might well have made for an absorbing noir mystery. Instead, however, the plot is infused with an array of seemingly unnecessary (and often underdeveloped and/or inadequately explained) story threads that only bog down the picture’s flow. This includes several supernatural, surreal and arguably bizarre sequences that appear to occur in the dream state (even if not fully recognized as such by the protagonist or sufficiently explained for viewers). The result is a run-on story that runs out of gas about midway through, becoming a progressively tedious watch that fails to maintain audience attention. To its credit, the film’s stylistic qualities are somewhat engaging and show some promise – at least at the outset – but they’re far from enough to sustain viewer interest as the saga haphazardly plays out toward what I ultimately found to be an unsatisfying conclusion. From this project, it would seem the filmmaker has potential to create works that are visually involving but that definitely need more solid narrative foundations to make them work as fully fleshed-out finished products, something that’s sorely lacking here. Perhaps “Gazer” represents a shakedown vehicle for the director to work out the bugs and prepare for better developed future projects (and, if so, then this may not be an entirely wasted effort). However, the next time out, the filmmaker needs to show improvement if there’s to be a next time after that.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.