Is George of the Jungle 2 Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, George of the Jungle 2 is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:George of the Jungle 2 is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Comedy, Family genre.
Answer: Maybe not, George of the Jungle 2 is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2003, George of the Jungle 2 emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, Comedy, Family domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of George and Ursula now have a son, George Junior, so Ursula's mother arrives to try and take them back to "civilization". Unlike standard genre fare, George of the Jungle 2 attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and George of the Jungle 2 features a noteworthy lineup led by Christopher Showerman . Supported by the likes of Julie Benz and Angus T. Jones , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of George of the Jungle 2 (2003) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: George of the Jungle 2 is a Adventure, Comedy, Family film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: George of the Jungle 2 attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of George of the Jungle 2 reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $12.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for George of the Jungle 2 is $12.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Disney Plus
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.5/10, and global collection metrics, George of the Jungle 2 stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2003 cinematic year.
George of the Jungle 2 is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.5/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.5/10, George of the Jungle 2 may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
George of the Jungle 2 is currently available for streaming on Disney Plus. You can also check for it on platforms like Disney Plus depending on your region.
**It would have been better not to make this film.** The first film worked very well, and the huge box office success ensured that there was going to be a sequel, sooner or later. Perhaps in a fit of lucidity, this attempt to make a sequel was not released in the theaters, but directly on video. I can't vouch for it, but I think someone realized that the movie was going to be a huge fiasco and a humiliation for Disney... Wanting to compare both films is such a frustrating exercise that it's better not to, even if it's unavoidable. The problems begin with the simple fact that none, or almost none, of the actors of the first film were called for this project, without it being in fact evident the reason that led to this replacement, almost generalized, of the cast. Furthermore, the film was not funny for a single minute, limiting itself to repeating comic formulas already used in the first film. The screenplay, with an unfortunate and poorly written story, is also part of the problem. The new cast may make attempts to recreate what we've already seen, but it's an exercise doomed to failure. For me, one of the basic rules of a good sequel or prequel is to get a good sense of continuity between films, and the absence of Brendan Fraser largely breaks that feeling. Julie Benz, who takes on the role of Ursula, is the best performer in this film. She manages to be friendly, and a pleasant presence in the film, but that's about it. John Cleese's voice continues to function reasonably well, but lacks the fundamental support of a witty and humorous text. The narrator is simply unbearable and boring. Even worse, or at least as tiresome as the narrator, is Christopher Showerman, who seems to be constantly copying Fraser and trying to be as good as the original. Technically, the film also leaves something to be desired. The animations don't work as well as would be required, and the animals look fake most of the time. The cinematography is, to say the least, excessively regular and monotonous for a movie that wants to be fun, and the bad graphics and visual effects don't convince. The sets and costumes also fell far short of my expectations, and the soundtrack doesn't bring anything really good.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise