Performance & Direction: Gladiator of Rome Review
Last updated: January 27, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Gladiator of Rome (1962) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.5/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Adventure.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Gladiator of Rome features a noteworthy lineup led by Gordon Scott . Supported by the likes of Wandisa Guida and Roberto Risso , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Gladiator of Rome (1962) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a decent one-time watch.
Story & Plot Summary: Gladiator of Rome
Quick Plot Summary: Gladiator of Rome is a Adventure, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Gladiator of Rome
Ending Breakdown: Gladiator of Rome attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the adventure themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Gladiator of Rome reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Gladiator of Rome Real vs. Reel: Is it Based on a True Story?
Gladiator of Rome draws heavily from documented historical records. As a adventure, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
Historical Context
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Gladiator of Rome adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Who Should Watch Gladiator of Rome?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Adventure films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Gladiator of Rome
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Gladiator of Rome Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
IndieFlix
IndieFlix Shorts Amazon Channel🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoGladiator of Rome Parents Guide & Age Rating
1962 AdvisoryWondering about Gladiator of Rome age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Gladiator of Rome is 97 minutes (1h 37m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.5/10, and global performance metrics, Gladiator of Rome is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1962 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gladiator of Rome worth watching?
Gladiator of Rome is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies. It has a verified rating of 5.5/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Gladiator of Rome parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Gladiator of Rome identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Gladiator of Rome?
The total duration of Gladiator of Rome is 97 minutes, which is approximately 1h 37m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Gladiator of Rome
How Gladiator of Rome Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Gladiator of Rome
Emperor Caracalla is ruling the Roman Empire with a rod of iron and it’s his excessive brutality that sees “Marcus” (Gordon Scott) forced into the life of a gladiator. Initially, he was a bodyguard for the fleeing princess “Nisa” (Wandisa Guida) before they were sold into their first unsavoury predicament. Their new owner “Valerio” (Roberto Risso) is a decent enough man, though, and even a bit keen on his new captive but before they can be freed the emperor orders the execution of his parents and so the couple are swiftly forced into a life of hard labour. The furious “Valerio” has sworn vengeance on those who slaughtered his parents, but he is also determined to marry the young “Nisa” and so tracks them down hoping to help them to escape. That doesn’t exactly go to plan but with death looming, the Governor (Charles Borromel) takes them to work in his household where “Marcus” is to be trained as a gladiator. All the while, we know that “Astarte” (Piero Lulli) has been dispatched from her homeland of Silesia with orders to kill her before she can accede to it’s recently usurped throne. Things don’t get any safer for the pair when “Nisa” is accused of being a Christian and it’s unlikely she will get the same lion as Daniel got. Now it is down to “Marcus” to rally his highly trained colleagues whilst he hopes more disaffected troops can arrive from the tenth legion to save their bacon and set up a grand denouement in the Coliseum. Now this hasn’t much originality to it, but boy does it pack a lot into one hundred minutes of mythology, murder and mayhem. If only someone had bothered to write it a little better and spend more time directing with more finesse, then it could have been a good solid adventure. As it is, though, it’s all a bit sloppy and derivative with Gordon Scott even more wooden that the cross he might be nailed to and there’s simply not enough action to accompany the various episodes in the colourful adventures of “Marcus” and “Nisa”. It is a good idea and probably looked fine on paper, but the execution is lacklustre, sorry.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
