Is Goal III: Taking on the World Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Goal III: Taking on the World is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 91 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Goal III: Taking on the World is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Goal III: Taking on the World is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 91 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2009, Goal III: Taking on the World emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Mexican footballer Santiago Muñez, along with his best friends and England national team players Charlie Braithwaite and Liam Adams, are selected for their respective national teams at the 2006 FIFA World Cup Finals in Germany. Unlike standard genre fare, Goal III: Taking on the World attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Goal III: Taking on the World features a noteworthy lineup led by JJ Feild . Supported by the likes of Leo Gregory and Kuno Becker , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Goal III: Taking on the World (2009) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Goal III: Taking on the World is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Goal III: Taking on the World attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Goal III: Taking on the World reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $10.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $7.6K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Goal III: Taking on the World is $10.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Allstars Amazon Channel
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4/10, and global collection metrics, Goal III: Taking on the World stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2009 cinematic year.
Goal III: Taking on the World is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Goal III: Taking on the World may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Goal III: Taking on the World is currently available for streaming on Allstars Amazon Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Allstars Amazon Channel depending on your region.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise