Is Going Under Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Going Under is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 98 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Going Under is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Going Under is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 98 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2004, Going Under emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Peter, a married psychotherapist, and Suzanne, a professional dominatrix, have been engaged in an affair of sensual dominance and submission in an S&M dungeon where they must abide by the rules. Unlike standard genre fare, Going Under attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Going Under features a noteworthy lineup led by Geno Lechner . Supported by the likes of Roger Rees and Klara Landrat , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Going Under (2004) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Going Under is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Going Under attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Going Under reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $50.0K |
| Worldwide Gross | $3.9K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Going Under is $50.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.






Amazon Video
Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.8/10, and global collection metrics, Going Under stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2004 cinematic year.
Going Under is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.8/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.8/10, Going Under may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Going Under may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Seems to be a more realistic look into the BDSM lifestyle (especially compared with the Hollywood-ized 50 Shades trilogy) and while the performances from both Geno Lechner and Roger Rees were both great, it is a pretty clinical and dry film. **2.5/5**
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.