Is Gold Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Gold is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 112 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Gold is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Drama, Western genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Gold is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 112 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2013, Gold emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, Drama, Western domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Canada, the summer of 1898. Unlike standard genre fare, Gold attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Gold features a noteworthy lineup led by Nina Hoss . Supported by the likes of Lars Rudolph and Uwe Bohm , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Gold (2013) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Gold is a Adventure, Drama, Western film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Gold attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Gold reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:







Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, Gold stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2013 cinematic year.
Gold has received mixed reviews with a 5.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Gold is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, Drama, Western movies, but read reviews first.
Gold may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Gritty hardships of traveling in the Far North during the Klondike Gold Rush RELEASED IN 2013 and written & directed by Thomas Arslan, "Gold” covers events in 1898 when a single woman (Nina Hoss) joins a small group of other prospectors heading north through Canada to the Klondike gold fields near Dawson City. Their numbers dwindle as they face challenging hardships. My title blurb says it all. Just as “Meek’s Cutoff” (2010) covered the adversities of traveling in the late 1800s on an alternative route of the Oregon Trail and “The Homesman” (2014) covered journeying from western Nebraska to Iowa, so “Gold” features the challenges of traveling from Ashcroft, BC, where the train tracks end, to Dawson City in the Yukon territories. Needless to say, “Gold” favors gritty realism to conventional Western staples. Still, there are Indians, Old West boom towns, covered wagons, a possible hanging, alcohol and a believable shootout. I think it’s a little more compelling than those other two flicks, although those are worthwhile too if you favor mundane accounts of arduous travel in the Old West. If you’d like to see a more eventful old-fashioned Western covering similar terrain, check out “The Far Country” (1954) with Jimmy Stewart. I suppose the movie should've contained at least one rain sequence, particularly considering it takes place in the Great Northwest. But shooting in the rain is challenging & costly so the viewer is asked to read in-between-the-lines that they experienced rainy days. The film never shows any of the characters 'going to the bathroom' either, but we're to assume it happened. A German/Canadian production, THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour 41 minutes and was shot in British Columbia, Canada. At least half the dialogue is in German with English subtitles. GRADE: B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.