Is Grierson Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Grierson is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 58 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Grierson is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, Grierson is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 58 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1973, Grierson emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A portrait of John Grierson, the first Canadian Government Film Commissioner and founder of the National Film Board in 1939. Unlike standard genre fare, Grierson attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Grierson features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Kane . Supported by the likes of John Grierson and Norman McLaren , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Grierson (1973) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Grierson is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Grierson concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Grierson reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.5/10, and global collection metrics, Grierson stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1973 cinematic year.
Grierson has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Grierson is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Documentary movies, but read reviews first.
Grierson may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Born in Edinburgh, Jack Grierson grew into an activist on a Clydeside soapbox in his teens advocating improvements in the lives of the poverty stricken shipbuilders struggling to make ends meet in early 20th century Scotland. The Great War took him into the Royal Navy and thence to university where a degree in moral philosophy saw him move to Chicago. This was at a time when Capone and prohibition dominated the city and when he fell in with journalist Walter Lipman. It was with him that Grierson decided that he must find a way to harness the increasing power of mass communication to get his message across to what he knew was a willing but dis/mis/uninformed public. A sojourn to Hollywood saw him further develop both his skills and his contacts and soon he was on his way to producing documentaries that delivered potent and effective storytelling on an whole range of subjects. As his successes grew and his methods attracted more to similar styles of programming, he became instrumental in establishing the National Film Board of Canada and to supervise and inspire it’s enormous variety of content both overtly commercial and more niche. This is as much a compelling look at the development of the art of documentary film making as it is an evaluation of a tenacious and visionary thumper who gradually learned how to take the tools of the written press and adapt them to more modern technology. There are a few quite revealing interviews included from both himself and from many whose life he touched as his role - despite the fact that he didn’t ever actually act himself - made him one of the industry’s ultimate and most respected critics. If you are at all interested in the development of movies with a more educational purpose, then you ought to give this an hour.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.