Is Hack-O-Lantern Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Hack-O-Lantern is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Hack-O-Lantern is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Hack-O-Lantern is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1988, Hack-O-Lantern emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of When Tommy was a boy, he saw his grandpa, the leader of a vicious satanic cult, murder his father in a brutal ritual on Halloween night. Unlike standard genre fare, Hack-O-Lantern attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Hack-O-Lantern features a noteworthy lineup led by Hy Pyke . Supported by the likes of Gregory Scott Cummins and Katina Garner , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Hack-O-Lantern (1988) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Hack-O-Lantern is a Horror, Thriller film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Hack-O-Lantern attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Hack-O-Lantern reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $5.5M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Hack-O-Lantern is $5.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.


Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Hack-O-Lantern stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1988 cinematic year.
Hack-O-Lantern is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.9/10, Hack-O-Lantern may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Hack-O-Lantern may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_A bad 80’s Halloween flick, but at least it tries to entertain_** As Tommy grows up in rural SoCal, he’s negatively influenced by his dubious grandfather (Hy Pyke). When he’s 21, the old man has a ritual scheduled for him on Halloween night. Naturally, his mother (Katina Garner), sister (Carla B.) and cop brother (Jeff Brown) oppose this. Everything culminates at the town’s Halloween party. Shot in the second half of November, 1986, "Hack-O-Lantern" wasn’t released until late March, 1988, and then only in the UK, although it was eventually released to video. Alternative titles include “Halloween Night,” “Death Mask” and “The Damning.” Despite its low-budget vibe, it actually cost a whopping $5.5 million. I say ‘whopping’ because the hailed “Halloween” was shot just 8.5 years earlier and only cost $325,000. Yet don’t expect the sense of artistry of that popular film. This is cartoonish and low-rent by comparison, characterized by the hammy acting of Hy Pyke as grandpa. Meanwhile Gregory Scott Cummins is a little too long in the tooth to portray 21 years-old Tommy (he was 30 during shooting), but that’s a minor cavil. If you can roll with the cheesiness, there are several highlights. For instance, the soundtrack features the catchy song “Devil’s Son” by DC Lacroix from Seattle/Los Angeles, who released two albums in the mid-80s before disappearing. Their style is akin to WASP meets The Runaways, basically catchy hanging chord anthemic hair metal. Meanwhile the cut “Against the Law” is performed by no-name band The Mercenaries at the Halloween party. Both tracks resurface for the closing credits. The other songs and score were done competently enough by Greg Haggard. Comedian Bill Tucker is thrown in for a surprise routine outside the party, which is amusing (“Gobble, gobble”). Sharp blonde Carla B., aka Carla Baron, stands out on the feminine front as the protagonist. Jeanna Fine is also alluring as Nora, the one with the short wild hair; she’s unnecessarily shown fully nude, no doubt in an attempt to make up for subpar filmmaking. She unsurprisingly dabbled in porn before marrying a Hebrew and converting to Judaism. The rest of the exploitive nudity could be classified under what Seinfeld called “bad naked.” It runs 1 hour, 27 minutes, and was shot in the rural outskirts of Los Angeles. GRADE: C
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.