Is Hacking Democracy Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Hacking Democracy is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 82 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Hacking Democracy is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.6/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Documentary, Crime genre.
Answer: Yes, Hacking Democracy is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 82 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2006, Hacking Democracy emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Documentary film investigating allegations of election fraud during the 2004 U. Unlike standard genre fare, Hacking Democracy attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Hacking Democracy features a noteworthy lineup led by James Naughton . Supported by the likes of Bev Harris and Harri Hursti , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: The lead actors exhibit a remarkable range, navigating the emotional peaks and valleys of their respective characters with a precision that makes every motivation feel earned.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Hacking Democracy (2006) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.6/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Hacking Democracy is a Documentary, Crime film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Hacking Democracy resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, creating a memorable conclusion that audiences have responded to positively.
The final moments of Hacking Democracy demonstrate careful narrative planning, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Hacking Democracy incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a documentary, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Hacking Democracy successfully translates real events into compelling cinema. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Highly Recommended For:


Apple TV
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.6/10, and global collection metrics, Hacking Democracy stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2006 cinematic year.
Hacking Democracy is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.6/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Documentary, Crime movies.
Yes, Hacking Democracy is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Documentary, Crime cinema.
Hacking Democracy may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


