Performance & Direction: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back Review
Last updated: January 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back (2011) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of NR. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back features a noteworthy lineup led by Kim Newman . Supported by the likes of Alan Jones and Rosie Fletcher , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back (2011) is negative. With an audience rating of NR, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back
Quick Plot Summary: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back
Ending Breakdown: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Documentary films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back
All Cast & Crew →
Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back Parents Guide & Age Rating
2011 AdvisoryWondering about Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back is 30 minutes (30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2011 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back worth watching?
Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 0/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back?
The total duration of Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back is 30 minutes, which is approximately 0h 30m long.
How Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Heavenly Creatures: Looking Back
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Kim Newman
