Hickok
Hickok Review: Story, Cast, Rating & Final Verdict
Last updated: April 11, 2026
Movie Overview: Hickok
| Movie | Hickok |
| Release Year | 2017 |
| Director | Timothy Woodward Jr. |
| Genre | Western |
| Runtime | 88 minutes |
| Language | EN |
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Hickok (2017) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Western.
Cast & Character Study
The performances in Hickok are led by Luke Hemsworth . The supporting cast, including Trace Adkins and Bruce Dern , provides the necessary layers to the central narrative.
movieMx Verdict: Is it Worth Your Time?
What Works in the Movie
While Hickok does not fully realize its potential, it still contains moments that may appeal to viewers who enjoy Western films.
- Interesting concept or premise
- Some entertaining scenes
- Supporting cast delivers occasional highlights
What Doesn't Work
Despite its strengths, Hickok has a few issues that may affect the overall viewing experience, particularly in terms of pacing and narrative consistency.
- Uneven pacing in certain parts of the film
- Some predictable plot developments
- May not appeal to audiences outside the Western fanbase
Story & Plot Summary: Hickok
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2017, Hickok is a Western film directed by Timothy Woodward Jr.. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Luke Hemsworth.
Ending Explained: Hickok
Hickok Ending Explained: Directed by Timothy Woodward Jr., Hickok attempts to bring together the film’s narrative threads. The ending highlights the core western themes developed throughout the film.
The conclusion reflects the central themes explored throughout the narrative, particularly in scenes involving Luke Hemsworth. The interpretation of the ending may vary among viewers.
Key Elements of the Ending
- Narrative Resolution: The story resolves its primary conflict while leaving room for interpretation.
- Character Development: Character motivations become clearer by the final scenes.
- Thematic Message: The ending reinforces the western themes introduced earlier in the film.
The final moments of Hickok reflect the creative choices of the filmmakers and align with the tone of the narrative.
Who Should Watch Hickok?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Western films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Hickok
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Hickok Online?
Streaming HubHickok Parents Guide & Age Rating
2017 AdvisoryWondering about Hickok age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Hickok is 88 minutes (1h 28m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.8/10, and global performance metrics, Hickok is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 2017 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Hickok worth watching?
Hickok is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies. It has a verified rating of 4.8/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Hickok parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Hickok identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Hickok?
The total duration of Hickok is 88 minutes, which is approximately 1h 28m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Hickok
How Hickok Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Hickok
I'm sorry, the movie has talent behind it. It also has talent familiar with westerns. But the direction stinks and the entire film in hampered by poor production values. It looks not unlike a movie of the week, if the movie of the week had half the budget of a single episode of a reality TV show. Here and there you can spot a clever lighting trick, something that adds a little bit of beauty, a little bit of photographic excellence. But those moments are few and far between, and even then you can tell that they were giving all they could with next to nothing. The sets just looked cheap, especially if you're watching it on a TV with any real resolution. Even the blood looked cheap and fake. The best thing this movie could have done was work in the shadows, make it dingy and dark in an effort to hide how cheap it all is. instead, it went for decent lighting, and unfortunately, that didn't hide as much as it should have.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
