Is Highlander: Endgame Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Highlander: Endgame is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Highlander: Endgame is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Adventure, Fantasy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Highlander: Endgame is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2000, Highlander: Endgame emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Adventure, Fantasy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Immortals Connor and Duncan Macleod join forces against a man from Connor's distant past in the highlands of Scotland, Kell, an immensely powerful immortal who leads an army of equally powerful and deadly immortal swordsmen and assassins. Unlike standard genre fare, Highlander: Endgame attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Highlander: Endgame features a noteworthy lineup led by Christopher Lambert . Supported by the likes of Adrian Paul and Bruce Payne , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Highlander: Endgame (2000) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Highlander: Endgame is a Action, Adventure, Fantasy film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Highlander: Endgame attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Highlander: Endgame reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $25.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $15.8M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Highlander: Endgame is $25.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.8/10, and global collection metrics, Highlander: Endgame stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2000 cinematic year.
Highlander: Endgame is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.8/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.8/10, Highlander: Endgame may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Highlander: Endgame may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**There should have been only one!** If “Highlander 2” was a complete disgrace and “Highlander 3” somehow tried to give us some compensation, this movie makes it look worse and more worn out. However, a TV series had been made that had little or nothing to do with the original film. What this movie came to try to do is to bring together the best of both worlds, but it failed completely. The problems start at the bottom, that is, in the miserably written script and without ideas that can truly be considered good or intelligent. At no time did I feel that the story of this film was interesting or captivating enough to justify the effort of seeing it. From the development it makes, we must assume that the action takes place after what we saw in the original film, which doesn't make much sense if we remember that this film ends in the victory of Connor, the last and only Immortal. The film has lots of plot holes and moments where logic and coherence take a vacation and disappear. The dialogues are poor, poorly finished and annoying. Historical flashbacks don't always work. The cast counts, for the last time, with the honorable participation of Christopher Lambert, now a mature actor. So mature it sounds dangerously old for the role he plays. Despite this, the actor does what he can with what little he has. Adrian Paul also doesn't let us down and gives a good performance, considering the filthy and regrettable quality of the material written for this film. Bruce Payne sounds histrionic and unconvincing, but he does what he has to do. The rest of the actors don't really have anything really good worth mentioning in detail. Victim of a very low budget, the film appears for what it is: a very cheap and undercooked production, which tastes bad and looks even worse than it tastes. An excuse for an action movie with swords and frantic duels amid a series of abandoned or deserted industrial sites. The cinematography, sets and costumes are what we would expect to find, but the visual effects and CGI are poor, amateurish and really inexcusable in a 2000s full-length film. It's a disgraceful film.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise