Is If I Were King Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, If I Were King is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:If I Were King is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, History genre.
Answer: Yes, If I Were King is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1938, If I Were King emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of King Louis XI masquerades as a commoner in Paris, seeking out the treachery he is sure lurks in his kingdom. Unlike standard genre fare, If I Were King attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and If I Were King features a noteworthy lineup led by Ronald Colman . Supported by the likes of Basil Rathbone and Frances Dee , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of If I Were King (1938) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: If I Were King is a Adventure, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: If I Were King concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of If I Were King reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
If I Were King draws heavily from documented historical records. As a adventure, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: If I Were King adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.8/10, and global collection metrics, If I Were King stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1938 cinematic year.
If I Were King has received mixed reviews with a 6.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
If I Were King is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, History movies, but read reviews first.
If I Were King may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
This is a cracking bit of swashbuckling adventure with Ronald Colman ("Villon") and particularly Basil Rathbone (Louis XI) on top form. The former is a poetic vagabond, Robin Hood style, character who pinches what he can to help feed the population of a besieged Paris, whilst their King sits in his palace living the life of Riley. When the King's personal store is raided, the King's guard step up their searches and it isn't long before "Villon" is apprehended. The King is a wily old buzzard, though, and realising potential in this man of the people, appoints him to command the city and his armies and before long the people begin to change their previously hostile views of Louis XI and everyone focuses on the looming Burgundian attacks. Coleman reminded me of Errol Flynn here; he displays a charming intimacy with both his colleagues and the audience that is engaging. Rathbone - who lost out on the Oscar to Walter Brennan for "Kentucky" (1938) - is also excellent as the shrewd monarch who must hold his kingdom together, despite some pretty obvious character flaws! Frank Lloyd keeps the whole thing moving along swiftly, with plenty of action, pithy dialogue and duplicity writ large. If you like the genre, then you ought to love this - I really enjoyed it.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


