Is In Dreams Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, In Dreams is likely a skip if you enjoy Mystery movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:In Dreams is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Mystery, Thriller, Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, In Dreams is likely a skip if you enjoy Mystery movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1999, In Dreams emerges as a significant entry in the Mystery, Thriller, Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A suburban housewife learns that she has psychic connections to a serial killer, and can predict this person's motives through her dreams. Unlike standard genre fare, In Dreams attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Mystery is often anchored by its ensemble, and In Dreams features a noteworthy lineup led by Annette Bening . Supported by the likes of Aidan Quinn and Stephen Rea , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of In Dreams (1999) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: In Dreams is a Mystery, Thriller, Horror film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: In Dreams attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to mystery resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of In Dreams reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $30.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $12.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for In Dreams is $30.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.5/10, and global collection metrics, In Dreams stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1999 cinematic year.
In Dreams has received mixed reviews with a 5.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
In Dreams is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Mystery, Thriller, Horror movies, but read reviews first.
In Dreams may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Stylistic Dirge. In Dreams is directed by Neil Jordan and adapted to screenplay by Jordan and Bruce Robinson from the Bari Wood novel. It stars Annette Bening, Aidan Quinn, Robert Downey Jr.and Paul Guilfoyle. Music is by Elliot Goldenthal and cinematography by Darius Khondji. In this contrived thriller, Bening is a grief stricken housewife who finds her thoughts in sync with a serial killer (a ridiculously miscast Downey Jr.). Neil Jordan is a great director, but he's also a very frustrating one, case in point In Dreams. The visuals are outstanding here as Jordan and Khondji paint a nightmarish world, but the flashbacks are unfocused and any sense of suspense or plot progression is lost in a whirl of stylised indulgence. Strip away the style and you find a formulaic serial killer picture hiding behind arty farty stubbornness. Bening's performance deserves a better movie, and it is with her, and the visual smarts, that the pic remains of interest till its resolution. 5/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.