Is Jack Johnson Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Jack Johnson is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Jack Johnson is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, Jack Johnson is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1970, Jack Johnson emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Jack Johnson is a 1970 documentary film directed by Jim Jacobs about the boxer Jack Johnson. Unlike standard genre fare, Jack Johnson attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Jack Johnson features a noteworthy lineup led by Jack Johnson . Supported by the likes of Brock Peters and Kevin Kennedy , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Jack Johnson (1970) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Jack Johnson is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Jack Johnson concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Jack Johnson reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:

Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.6/10, and global collection metrics, Jack Johnson stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1970 cinematic year.
Jack Johnson has received mixed reviews with a 6.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Jack Johnson is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Documentary movies, but read reviews first.
Jack Johnson may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
When Jack Johnson fought for his world title against Tommy Burns in 1908, it looked a bit like David and Goliath and starts quite a fascinating journey for us through not just the history of boxing (replete with elements of racial bigotry and hatred) but also an almost encyclopaedic look at the evolution of the coverage of the sport on film. This documentary offers us a surprisingly comprehensive chronology of the man, with little by way of useful narrative but with plenty of Miles Davis to immerse us thoroughly in this era. Dominant throughout the early part of the twentieth century, he struggled on the personal front and when his wife committed suicide he sought refuge in Paris as the Great War clouds gathered. In his mid forties, he was tempted back to Cuba for a fight under the “insidious” heat of the sun for a best-of-45 round world title fight against the far younger Jim Jeffries and as this proceeds, you can almost see the strength and vitality sapping from his legs. Aside from the boxing, there is plenty of social commentary as the effects of his successes stimulated inspiration, celebration and division in equal measure, with even the US Congress having to legislate to prevent the televising and even the staging of prize fights to counter some of the more reactionary behaviour that accompanied his bouts. It takes a look at his other ventures, and his numerous convictions for everything from running a speakeasy to lewd behaviour, and yet with this fairly clear impetus from the government continuously rowing against him, he retained a determination to succeed. Having been brought up with nothing, he shows a clear intention to make money, and more money, and then even more and though this certainly does not portray a saintly man, it does portray one who was prepared to put in the graft and who doubtless encouraged many to try to escape from their poverty traps.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


