Is Jackson Durai Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Jackson Durai is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 134 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Jackson Durai is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Comedy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Jackson Durai is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 134 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, Jackson Durai emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A cop sent to investigate allegedly ghostly affairs in a village agrees to stay in a haunted bungalow for seven days to win the hand of a girl in the place. Unlike standard genre fare, Jackson Durai attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Jackson Durai features a noteworthy lineup led by Sibiraj . Supported by the likes of Bindu Madhavi and Sathyaraj , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Jackson Durai (2016) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Jackson Durai is a Horror, Comedy film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Jackson Durai attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Jackson Durai reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:







Zee5
Sun Nxt
VI movies and tvAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.6/10, and global collection metrics, Jackson Durai stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Jackson Durai is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.6/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.6/10, Jackson Durai may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Jackson Durai is currently available for streaming on Zee5. You can also check for it on platforms like Zee5, Sun Nxt, VI movies and tv depending on your region.
How can someone who displayed so much filmmaking flair in his debut come up with such a lacklustre sophomore effort? That's the question that crops up after watching Jackson Durai, which is directed by Dharanidharan, who gave us the stylish crime thriller Burma. The film is a horror comedy, a genre that is very much the trend today, and going by the director's previous film, you expect at least a competently made film that keeps us entertained. But the only thing that we have in store is disappointment. The plot is set in Ayanpuram, a village that is bothered by ghosts that put in an appearance every night once the clock strikes nine. So, the police send Sathya (Sibi), an empty vessel of a cop, to investigate these claims. He, in true Tamil cinema tradition, falls in love with Viji (Bindu Madhavi), a girl in the village the moment he steps foot in the place. Even as he begins his so-called investigation, he realises there is another challenger to Viji's hand — her relative Veera (Karunakaran). So, the girl's father provides them with a challenge — whoever manages to stay alive in the haunted bungalow in the village for seven days will be the chosen one. The problem is that the writing seems slapdash with scenes that are either cliched or too convenient. The best example of this is the flashback portion that shows us how the ghosts came to be, and what they are after. It involves the independence struggle and a personal conflict between the local British head (Zachary) and a revolutionary (Sathyaraj). There is tragedy but it doesn't feel tragic enough; there are patriotic lines but they aren't rousing enough; there is a villain but he isn't fearsome enough; there is also Sathyaraj, and he isn't entertaining enough. It's no wonder the film goes downhill after this segment. Even a Groundhog Day-ish situation that comes next is dealt with in an unimaginative manner. In fact, at least until then, we are kept amused thanks to the comedy elements. Karunakaran, especially, is very funny in these portions, and keeps the scenes engaging, with Yogi Babu chipping in now and then. But these handful of laughs cannot compensate for the overall tediousness.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.