Is Joan of Arc Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Joan of Arc is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 145 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Joan of Arc is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Joan of Arc is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 145 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1948, Joan of Arc emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In the 15th Century, France is a defeated and ruined nation after the One Hundred Years War against England. Unlike standard genre fare, Joan of Arc attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Joan of Arc features a noteworthy lineup led by Ingrid Bergman . Supported by the likes of Francis L. Sullivan and J. Carrol Naish , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Joan of Arc (1948) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Joan of Arc is a Drama, History film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Joan of Arc concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Joan of Arc reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Joan of Arc draws heavily from documented historical records. As a drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Joan of Arc adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.1/10, and global collection metrics, Joan of Arc stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1948 cinematic year.
Joan of Arc has received mixed reviews with a 6.1/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Joan of Arc is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, History movies, but read reviews first.
Joan of Arc may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
But if I had a hundred fathers and a hundred mothers, I could not go back. I must go forward now. In the Fifteenth Century, France is a defeated and ruined nation after the One Hundred Years War against England. Up steps a teenage farm girl who claims to hear voices from heaven telling her to lead God's army against Orleans and to crown the weak Dauphin Charles VII as the King of France. Joan gathers the people with her faith, forms an army and advances on Orleans - from here real history is formed in all its heroic and tragic glory... Savaged by some critics, cut by the studio to various run times, it really is a case of asking film fans to at least see the now readily available full 145 minute version to give it a fair trial. Starring Ingrid Bergman in the title role and directed by a clearly fawning Victor Fleming (he takes every single opportunity to focus on Bergman's natural beauty), it's unfortunately a mixture of a stirring historical epic with over theatrical stage bound theatricals. Bergman, although surrounded by a great array of superlative supporting players, carries the lead role with aplomb. She clearly dives into the role with a passion of some distinction and film lovers are rewarded with a performance of great depth and feeling, none more so with the sequences in the last tragic quarter of the pic. The screenplay by Maxwell Anderson and Andrew Holt (based on the play "Joan of Lorraine") is beautifully written, with dialogue passages that stir the blood whilst holding court. For some the literate passages may come off as long winded, even tedious, but in Bergman's hands they hopefully will entice the masses in the way that "The Maid of Orleans" actually did. 7.5/10
Whatever you do, try to avoid the dreadfully hacked version of this - the original version; coming in at just under 2½ hours is far, far better. That said, however - it still isn't all that great. Ingrid Bergman doesn't so much act as Joan of Arc, she suggests quite strongly that Joan of Arc would have been just like her! The pained, saintly expression coupled with the rousing battle cries and heartfelt pleading make it hard to imagine the real woman could have been anything but! José Ferrer expertly plays the, duplicitous, selfish monarch who'd betray his own mother for a sou in a creepily magnetic fashion and, of course, Francis L. Sullivan is super as the presiding Bishop Cauchon serving whichever master suits him best so long as our heroine goes to the flames. The rest of the cast rather underperform though: Ward Bond, Gene Lockhart and Cecil Kellaway are fish out of water and Lief Erickson is frankly dreadful in the quite pivotal role of Dunois. The writing is dreary; way too wordy. The ensemble performances never seem to set foot out of doors, which renders the battle scene largely ineffective and the trial scenes are just all too bitty to establish any genuine sense of the threat she was under during this corrupt trial. Maybe it needed Cecil B. De Mille to take the grand scale cinematography to it - the story certainly merits it; but this is uncomfortably constricted and too physically theatrical. The costumes are glorious, though, and the lighting does go some way to compensate for the rigidity the production. Well worth watching, but it could have been much better had Victor Fleming had more imagination.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.