Is Julius Caesar Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Julius Caesar is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 117 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Julius Caesar is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the War, Drama, History genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Julius Caesar is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 117 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1970, Julius Caesar emerges as a significant entry in the War, Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of All-star cast glamorizes this lavish 1970 remake of the classic William Shakespeare play, which portrays the assassination of Julius Caesar on the Ides of March, and the resulting war between the faction led by the assassins and the faction led by Mark Anthony. Unlike standard genre fare, Julius Caesar attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any War is often anchored by its ensemble, and Julius Caesar features a noteworthy lineup led by Charlton Heston . Supported by the likes of Jason Robards and John Gielgud , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Julius Caesar (1970) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Julius Caesar is a War, Drama, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Julius Caesar attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to war resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Julius Caesar reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Julius Caesar draws heavily from documented historical records. As a war, drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Julius Caesar adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, Julius Caesar stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1970 cinematic year.
Julius Caesar has received mixed reviews with a 5.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Julius Caesar is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of War, Drama, History movies, but read reviews first.
Julius Caesar may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I recall seeing Charlton Heston on stage at the height of his "Man For All Seasons" theatrical pomp, and he wasn't half bad. In this, however, made much earlier - he is still very much honing his theatrical skills. He portrays Mark Anthony, and the rest of an admittedly acclaimed cast stick pretty closely to the narrative of the bard's telling of the rise and fall of Caesar. That role falls to Sir John Gielgud, the only established thespian amongst this rather odd assembly of talent that deliver, with varying degrees of conviction, some of the best lines in English literature. Jason Robards makes a decent fist of Brutus as does Diana Rigg (Portia) but Richard Chamberlain (Octavius), Robert Vaughn (Casca) and Richard Johnson (Cassius) really fall well short of the mark with their over-dramatised emphasis on the language and the gestures. The costumes and photography in general look fine, but somehow that seems to add to this effort's problems - it lacks the intensity and intimacy of a stage performance. Indeed, I wonder if the same cast were to have done this in a theatre, might it not have been more distinguished? It is certainly worth a watch, there is a suitably rousing score from Michael J. Lewis, but I think the end product is not equal to the sum of it's parts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.