Is Laughter Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Laughter is likely a skip if you enjoy Romance movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Laughter is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Romance, Comedy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Laughter is likely a skip if you enjoy Romance movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1930, Laughter emerges as a significant entry in the Romance, Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Zeigfeld Follies beauty Peggy marries an older man, C. Unlike standard genre fare, Laughter attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Romance is often anchored by its ensemble, and Laughter features a noteworthy lineup led by Nancy Carroll . Supported by the likes of Fredric March and Frank Morgan , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Laughter (1930) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Laughter is a Romance, Comedy film that explores the complexities of love and relationships with emotional depth and authenticity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Laughter attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to romance resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Laughter reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:








Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.7/10, and global collection metrics, Laughter stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1930 cinematic year.
Laughter is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.7/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.7/10, Laughter may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Laughter may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Harry D'Abbadie d'Arrast doesn't hang about with this tale of rags to riches that has loads of emotional baggage thrown in for good measure. "Peggy" (Nancy Carroll) is let down by her true love and takes the easy option by marrying the dull and staid millionaire "Gibson" (Frank Morgan) who guarantees her an easy, if uninteresting life. She's too restless a spirit for all of that, and although she resists the advances of the boyish and unstable sculptor "Ralph" (Glenn Anders) she is ready to jump ship when the carefree "Lockridge" (Fredric March) re-emerges into her life with a plan for her to escape her silk-clad drudgery and head for la Vie Parisienne - via some high jinx and a bit of burglary. Tempted, her life is thrown into turmoil by the daughter of her husband, "Marjorie" (Diane Ellis) who has a few designs of her own! This tries hard to straddle a few genres here, and whilst the dramatic aspects work well enough, the comedic ones prove a little beyond everyone to convincingly pull off. As the story progresses, even the usually reliable Morgan looks a little uncomfortable with the increasingly contrived nature of the plot within a plot within a plot. Also, by the end I'd rather concluded that "Peggy" was no great shakes as an human being either. The production could fairly be described as embryonic and the photography seemed framed at times as if to allow the actors to read cue cards off-set the cameras - that looked a bit squinty. Still, it's all quite light-hearted and enjoyably enough paced to pass ninety minutes effortlessly.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.