Is Leatherlip Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Leatherlip is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Leatherlip is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Leatherlip is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1972, Leatherlip emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A super-model begins to question her glitzy, frenetic lifestyle when she awakes after a all night party to find a strange man in her bed. Unlike standard genre fare, Leatherlip attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Leatherlip features a noteworthy lineup led by Evon de Meistre . Supported by the likes of Richard Loring and Whotsie , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Leatherlip (1972) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Leatherlip is a Adventure, Drama film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Leatherlip attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Leatherlip reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:



Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4/10, and global collection metrics, Leatherlip stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1972 cinematic year.
Leatherlip is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Leatherlip may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Leatherlip may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
As far as I know, this is a lost film. If anyone knows of an existing copy, please contact me. My thanks to 2nd Unit director **Josh Spencer** for supplying the info on this film. (Most of it from memory!). For those who are interested, I have posted Josh’s comments and a full film synopsis below. **2nd Unit Director's Comments** > This film is exploitative in the most literal sense in that Director Stuart Pringle had no clear idea of what the film would be. He simply exploited whatever production value he could find in locations, props and people he encountered whilst the unit travelled across southern Africa. All dialogue was improvised. There was no shooting script. Stuart was open to ideas from all crew members and gave me a free hand to direct the petrified forest sequence (amongst others) in his absence. > > The wildly diverse material – fashion industry, surfing, Leatherlip's camp, drag racing, wildlife, bushman encampment, and much material of Leatherlip travelling on his exotic trike through various landscapes was woven into a semblance of a story by Editor Tommy Doig. Colin Shapiro's music helped knit it together too. The result was an adventure/travelogue that captured much of the late 60's ethos. Considering that it was made on a shoe-string budget, with a tiny crew and amateur Director and leads, the end product is surprisingly enjoyable. **Film Synopsis (Contains spoilers)** > A super-model (Evon de Meistre) begins to question her glitzy, frenetic lifestyle when she awakes after a all night party to find a strange man (Richard Loring) in her bed. Suffering a nervous breakdown she is intent on suicide and is about to throw herself off a cliff when she sees a surfer riding the waves below. She follows him to his tented camp on the banks of a river. 'Leatherlip' (Tim . . . . .) is a free spirit, earning a living making leather goods and roaming around on an extraordinary 'trike' with his worldly goods and surfboard strapped on an overhead rack. > > They fall in love and she abandons her previous life, entranced with his gypsy-like existence. They enjoy a blissful interlude, surfing, swimming in the river, exploring forests and lying in each others arms around the camp fire each night. Then inexplicably she disappears. Leatherlip sets off on a cross-country odyssey to find her, knowing only that her father (Bill Brewer) lives on a boat on the West Coast. He wins a drag race on his trike to finance his search and has many adventures. Crossing the Kalahari, rides through huge herds of antelope, he rescues an injured bushman (Whotsie), is fated as a hero at a Bushman camp, gets run off the road by roughnecks and gets lost in a sandstorm. Weary and dispirited by his seemingly futile quest, in a dramatic petrified forest he re-connects to the natural world and draws strength to continue. Eventually, he finds her father and is reunited with his lover.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.