Is Loot Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Loot is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Loot is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Crime genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Loot is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1970, Loot emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two bank robbers, Dennis and Hal, are on the run from the police after a successful heist. Unlike standard genre fare, Loot attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Loot features a noteworthy lineup led by Richard Attenborough . Supported by the likes of Lee Remick and Hywel Bennett , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Loot (1970) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Loot is a Comedy, Crime film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Loot attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Loot reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Loot incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a comedy, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Loot adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:









Google Play Movies
Google Play MoviesAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.5/10, and global collection metrics, Loot stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1970 cinematic year.
Loot has received mixed reviews with a 5.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Loot is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Loot may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I have seen this play on stage a few times and I must say that it really does work better there. On screen, even though that does allow for greater location flexibility, the story/farce is just a little too undercooked and slapstick here for my liking. It all centres around "Hal" (Roy Holder) and his pal "Dennis" (Hywel Bennett) who have managed to rob a bank. One works in a funeral parlour, so they hit on the idea of stashing their ill-gotten gains in an as yet unoccupied coffin and to lie low for a while. Hot on their trail is the razor-sharp, wandering-handed, "Insp. Truscott" (Richard Attenborough) and as their secret proves difficult to keep, they have to manage the venal expectations of nurse "Fay" (Lee Remick) too. Like so many of it's genre, the humour is very visual and unsophisticated. Again, on stage that exudes a certain adult pantomime feel to it. On screen, that misses much more often than it hits and the pair of them carrying around their cash in the altogether whilst delivering some rather crude, innuendo-ridden, dialogue smacked more of a "Carry On Coffin" type affair. The ending has a twist and that does raise a smile and Milo O'Shea injects a gentle mischief now and again, but that's not enough to carry the rest of this rather crass and mediocre comedy drama.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.