Is Loser Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Loser is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Loser is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Romance genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Loser is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2000, Loser emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of On a university scholarship, a good natured student from the midwest gets a crash course in city life while dealing with three evil roommates. Unlike standard genre fare, Loser attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Loser features a noteworthy lineup led by Jason Biggs . Supported by the likes of Mena Suvari and Zak Orth , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Loser (2000) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Loser is a Comedy, Romance film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Loser attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Loser reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:










Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.4/10, and global collection metrics, Loser stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2000 cinematic year.
Loser has received mixed reviews with a 5.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Loser is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Loser may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
He is exactly what the title says, he's a loser. Really funny too. Just your typical loser going through college.
**_Jason Biggs and Mena Suvari in college in Lower Manhattan_** This is not a raunchy sex comedy like the “American Pie” flicks (thankfully), nor would I describe it as a romantic comedy, although there’s some of that; it’s really a college-oriented drama with some amusing touches, aka dramedy. Biggs is likable as the protagonist who’s coming-of-age as a young man whilst Suvari is, needless to say, winsome as the love interest. For anyone who condemns the movie for unpalatable elements, such as Dora foolishly sleeping with the charismatic professor (Greg Kinnear), it happens at every university. Let’s face it, most beautiful young women are taken advantage by some smooth-talking arrogant piece-of-sheet before (hopefully) learning their lesson. As for the three annoying frat boys who like to put roofies in the drinks of coeds (Zak Orth, Thomas Sadoski and Jimmi Simpson), these types exist in real life. They’re just slightly exaggerated here. Besides, every good story has to have its antagonists. The veterinarian hospital subplot is a highlight, particularly the freshly birthed kitten sequence. This reveals a warm heart underneath. It’s not great like “Clueless” but, if you like that one, you’ll probably appreciate this. It runs 1h 38m and was shot from Nov-Jan 1999-2000 in Toronto with some bits in Manhattan. GRADE: B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.