Performance & Direction: Lunch Hour Review
Last updated: January 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Lunch Hour (1962) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 6.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Comedy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Lunch Hour features a noteworthy lineup led by Shirley Anne Field . Supported by the likes of Robert Stephens and Kay Walsh , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Lunch Hour (1962) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Lunch Hour
Quick Plot Summary: Lunch Hour is a Comedy film that brings laughter through sharp writing and comedic timing, providing amusement while touching on deeper societal themes. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Lunch Hour
Ending Breakdown: Lunch Hour concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the comedy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Lunch Hour reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Lunch Hour?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Comedy films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want some laughs and light entertainment
Top Cast: Lunch Hour
All Cast & Crew →




Where to Watch Lunch Hour Online?
Streaming HubLunch Hour Parents Guide & Age Rating
1962 AdvisoryWondering about Lunch Hour age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Lunch Hour is 64 minutes (1h 4m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.8/10, and global collection metrics, Lunch Hour stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1962 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lunch Hour worth watching?
Lunch Hour is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies. It has a verified rating of 6.8/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Lunch Hour parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Lunch Hour identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Lunch Hour?
The total duration of Lunch Hour is 64 minutes, which is approximately 1h 4m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Lunch Hour
How Lunch Hour Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Lunch Hour
Shirley Anne Field is a young girl who gradually falls for her factory boss Robert Stephens - neither character are actually given names here! Their meetings are initially restricted to park chats or a visit to the tea room, which become gradually more frustrating as both wish to take their relationship to the next level. To that end he decides to procure an hotel room - and spins some fanciful yarns to the landlady along the way. What makes this otherwise rather procedural melodrama interesting is that the latter stages of the story increasingly see the young woman enter the realms of her imagination. What develops now for her is a family scenario with domestic bliss turning to domestic discord that though potent in it's intention is a little implausible. Not because she clearly has some form of schizophrenia, but because the man appears oblivious or uncaring to it - and that doesn't really sit with the basic premiss of the film, nor of their affection for each other. Their afternoon trysts would have surely demonstrated to him that she was ill and yet her fantasies proceed largely unfettered. There is, however, a strong dynamic between these two actors and peppered with only a few brief appearances from Kay Walsh running her den of iniquity, it is a strongly written and well presented two-hander that does offer food for thought.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.












