Is Manhandled Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Manhandled is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Manhandled is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Manhandled is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1949, Manhandled emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Merle Kramer works as a stenographer for a psychiatrist. Unlike standard genre fare, Manhandled attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Manhandled features a noteworthy lineup led by Dorothy Lamour . Supported by the likes of Sterling Hayden and Dan Duryea , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Manhandled (1949) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Manhandled is a Crime, Drama film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Manhandled attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Manhandled reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Manhandled incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, drama film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Manhandled adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Manhandled stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1949 cinematic year.
Manhandled is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.9/10, Manhandled may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Manhandled may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Kitten and Chaos. Manhandled is directed by Lewis R. Foster and adapted to screenplay by Foster and Whitman Chambers from the novel "The Man Who Stole A Dream" written by L. S. Goldsmith. It stars Dorothy Lamour, Dan Duryea, Sterling Hayden, Irene Hervey and Art Smith. Music is by Darrell Calker and cinematography by Ernest Laszlo. I'm going to kill you, Ruth. I have to. Manhandled is one of those late 40s crime mysteries that feature film noir legends and film noir narrative tints, thus why it finds itself under the film noir banner. This is more a curse than a blessing. For it's not a particularly great film, where the presence of Hayden and Duryea - and Laszlo on photography - just about keeps things bubbling away to make it watchable till the end. It has been said that the narrative is too tricksy for its own good, yet that isn't apparent since the story is very easy to follow. The twists come and go at regular intervals, but always with narrative clarity. The main thrust of the plot finds Lamour being set up as the killer of Mrs. Alton Bennet (Hervey), with Bennet's jewels the reason for the crime. But there are a few other candidates in the frame, all of which are written to be believable suspects. The cops investigating are waspish of tongue, with Smith as dry as the Sahara, and Hayden is playing an insurance investigator who is along for the ride doing exactly the same job that the coppers are doing! Duryea is the star attraction, playing a homme fatale type who chews gum a lot, calls his girlfriend Kitten and clearly is as untrustworthy as it gets (classic Duryea portrayal really!). Hayden doesn't show up until half an hour in, but he's a welcome arrival even if he isn't given much to get his teeth into. While Lamour pouts and ponders whilst gaining sympathy, which ultimately makes us wish she had of done more film noir type films. There's some nice metaphorical touches, such as Duryea encamped in his apartment watching a vermin species consistently running on its wheel, and Laszlo's photography goes up a notch in the latter half of film - Lamour's apartment becomes foreboding and all the hall staircase sequences take on a greater oppressive meaning. A dream sequence is chilling, and there's one particular violent scene that is unforgettable. Unfortunately some of the comedy, whilst funny at times (drugs scenes are chucklesome), takes the pic out of its dramatic comfort zone. Hayden and Duryea fans are safe in the knowledge that this is one to see, but it still winds up as a wasted opportunity to be something far more tougher and poignant. 6/10
Dorothy Lamour is good in this otherwise rather drab crime noir. The plot is overly complex, bordering on the convoluted - you could almost get dizzy trying to follow the plot. Which is (briefly): Lamour plays "Merle"; the PA to a psychiatrist. She casually discusses his private cases with her on/off amour (Dan Duryea) and one such story involved a client's (Alan Napier) dreams that he kills his wealthy wife. Well, yep - you've guessed - the wife is duly murdered and an investigation ensues. Duryea, as the oily, smart-mouthed PI and Sterling Hayden as the investigating insurance man do fine, and Art Smith makes for quite a decent cop, but Lewis Foster let's this ramble on and no amount of tense violin music can compensate for what is just a lacklustre murder thriller.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.