Performance & Direction: Marijuana: A Chronic History Review
Last updated: January 25, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Marijuana: A Chronic History (2010) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.7/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Marijuana: A Chronic History features a noteworthy lineup led by Doug Benson . Supported by the likes of Melissa Etheridge and Joe Rogan , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Marijuana: A Chronic History (2010) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a decent one-time watch.
Story & Plot Summary: Marijuana: A Chronic History
Quick Plot Summary: Marijuana: A Chronic History is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Marijuana: A Chronic History
Ending Breakdown: Marijuana: A Chronic History attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Marijuana: A Chronic History reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Marijuana: A Chronic History?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Documentary films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Marijuana: A Chronic History
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Marijuana: A Chronic History Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
History VaultMarijuana: A Chronic History Parents Guide & Age Rating
2010 AdvisoryWondering about Marijuana: A Chronic History age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Marijuana: A Chronic History is 88 minutes (1h 28m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.7/10, and global performance metrics, Marijuana: A Chronic History is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 2010 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Marijuana: A Chronic History worth watching?
Marijuana: A Chronic History is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 5.7/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Marijuana: A Chronic History parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Marijuana: A Chronic History identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Marijuana: A Chronic History?
The total duration of Marijuana: A Chronic History is 88 minutes, which is approximately 1h 28m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Marijuana: A Chronic History
How Marijuana: A Chronic History Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Marijuana: A Chronic History
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
