Mazes and Monsters
Performance & Direction: Mazes and Monsters Review
Last updated: January 24, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Mazes and Monsters (1982) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.3/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Fantasy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Fantasy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Mazes and Monsters features a noteworthy lineup led by Tom Hanks . Supported by the likes of Wendy Crewson and David Wallace , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Mazes and Monsters (1982) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.3/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: Mazes and Monsters
Quick Plot Summary: Mazes and Monsters is a Fantasy, Drama, TV Movie film that transports viewers to imaginative worlds filled with magic, wonder, and epic adventures. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Mazes and Monsters
Ending Breakdown: Mazes and Monsters attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to fantasy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the fantasy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Mazes and Monsters reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Mazes and Monsters?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Fantasy films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Mazes and Monsters
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Mazes and Monsters Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Cultpix🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoMazes and Monsters Parents Guide & Age Rating
1982 AdvisoryWondering about Mazes and Monsters age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Mazes and Monsters is 100 minutes (1h 40m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.3/10, and global performance metrics, Mazes and Monsters is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1982 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mazes and Monsters worth watching?
Mazes and Monsters is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Fantasy movies. It has a verified rating of 4.3/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Mazes and Monsters parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Mazes and Monsters identifies it as PG. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Mazes and Monsters?
The total duration of Mazes and Monsters is 100 minutes, which is approximately 1h 40m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Mazes and Monsters
How Mazes and Monsters Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Mazes and Monsters
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
