Is McEnroe Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, McEnroe is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:McEnroe is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, McEnroe is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2022, McEnroe emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Legendary "bad boy of tennis" John McEnroe finally tells his side of his storied career and famously hot-tempered performances on the court in this engrossing documentary revisiting the record-setting career of one of the all-time greats. Unlike standard genre fare, McEnroe attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and McEnroe features a noteworthy lineup led by John McEnroe . Supported by the likes of Patty Smyth and Kevin McEnroe , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of McEnroe (2022) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: McEnroe is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: McEnroe concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of McEnroe reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:


fuboTV
Paramount+ Amazon Channel
Paramount+ Roku Premium Channel
Paramount Plus Premium
Amazon Video
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, McEnroe stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2022 cinematic year.
McEnroe has received mixed reviews with a 6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
McEnroe is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Documentary movies, but read reviews first.
McEnroe is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV, Paramount+ Amazon Channel, Paramount+ Roku Premium Channel, Paramount Plus Premium depending on your region.
Whilst it is quite interesting, this documentary, it is still little better than a self-indulgent reminiscence by the man himself that features virtually no contributions from those folks who suffered from his petulance and immaturity - both on the court and elsewhere. Set against a long stroll through his haunts in New York, it takes us on a chronologically ordered career retrospective focussing on his rise to global success on the tennis court; his "superbrat" behaviour and his flawed relationships with friends and family alike but it's all done very much on his own terms. His moments of revelation - long since appreciated by anyone who watched him and his tantrums as they grew up (including me) - are presented by him in an almost celebratory way. Could he have achieved what he did - which, by even the standards of the day in his sport are nothing particularly remarkable - without the attention seeking strops? Sure there was gamesmanship going on a-plenty, but he seemed to revel in the extent to which he "recreated" tennis - or that is certainly the perspective I took from this very disappointing Barney Douglas feature. It completely lacks objectivity allowing this undoubtedly talented but supremely peevish man to write his own story and though there is the slightest hint of a mea culpa at the end, it's all very much "How History Should Remember John McEnroe" - by John McEnroe himself. Worth a watch, but under-delivers.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.