Is Monster Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Monster is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 86 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Monster is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 3.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Horror, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Monster is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 86 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2008, Monster emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Horror, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two women, aspiring documentary filmmakers, find themselves trapped in a monster-plagued Tokyo in 2003. Unlike standard genre fare, Monster attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Monster features a noteworthy lineup led by Erin Evans . Supported by the likes of Sarah Lieving and Jennifer Kim , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Monster (2008) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Monster is a Action, Horror, Science Fiction film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Monster attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Monster reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $500.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Monster is $500.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.





FlixFling
FlixFling
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.2/10, and global collection metrics, Monster stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2008 cinematic year.
Monster is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 3.2/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 3.2/10, Monster may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Monster is currently available for streaming on FlixFling. You can also check for it on platforms like FlixFling depending on your region.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.